Talk:Edinburgh, Leith and Newhaven Railway/GA1
Appearance
GA Review
[edit]Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Starting review.Pyrotec (talk) 11:19, 26 October 2008 (UTC)
GAR
[edit]GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria
Article was submitted too early in its life, a mere three days after work started.
- Is it reasonably well written?
- A. Prose quality:
- B. MoS compliance:
- based almost entirely on two tertiary web sources and two dictionaries
- A. Prose quality:
- Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
- A. References to sources:
- based almost entirely on two tertiary web sources and two dictionaries
- B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:
- C. No original research:
- almost no research done
- A. References to sources:
- Is it broad in its coverage?
- A. Major aspects:
- B. Focused:
- A. Major aspects:
- Is it neutral?
- Fair representation without bias:
- Fair representation without bias:
- Is it stable?
- No edit wars, etc:
- Yes, but its less than a week old!
- No edit wars, etc:
- Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
- A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
- B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
- A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
- Overall:
- Pass or Fail:
- This railway is extensively covered in, books listed in Category:Rail transport book citation templates. For example, Robertson (1983), Thomas (1971), Jowett (1993), Awdry (1990). The Sub Brit web site has useful information not found elsewhere, such as the use of Scotland Street tunnel as a WWII air raid shelter, etc; but for other than this its an External link, not a reference. The article is currently at about C-class, certainly not a GA.
- Pass or Fail: