Talk:Edgar Ray Killen

Allegedly

Some right wing racist nut job is putting "allegedly" in the header and adding references to some book he has written that "proves innocence". Hopefully there will be no controversy in me deleting it. Aredbeardeddwarf (talk) 23:52, 22 August 2018 (UTC)

Thank you — Preceding unsigned comment added by 12.53.232.146 (talk) 21:19, 7 April 2022 (UTC)

Questions

Strange that there is no discussion here yet. Maybe I'm missing something. Anyway, I read the article and found it odd that someone would be acquitted because of an 11-1 hung jury. Don't they begin a new trial in the case of a hung jury? Also, I thought that there was a rule against trying someone twice for the same crime if they are acquitted the first time. Double jeopardy, right? Why are they allowed to try him again? You can tell that I'm not a law student... Hermitage 10:04, 16 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Good questions. I believe the first trial was for federal civil rights violations, so the present trial is on a different charge (murder), and thus no double jeopardy. Someone who's read up on the trial might want to make that clear in the article. --Kevin Myers 03:08, Jun 19, 2005 (UTC)

This has been resolved, I hope? In any case US constitutional law says that double jeopardy does not apply when different judicial entities are involved. Thus the LA cops who beat Rodney King were acquitted on state charges, but convicted on federal civil rights charges. This is the entire basis for many federal civil rights prosecutions in the 1960s on, because many times the individuals had been fully acquitted on state charges by all-white juries. This belongs in the other articles, though, as it doesn't apply to Killen. --Dhartung | Talk 18:49, 24 Jun 2005 (UTC)

What you say is true, but more to the point in this case is that the original (federal) trial resulted in a hung jury. Even aside from the more recent state involvement, federal prosecutors could have chosen to retry Killen without violating the double jeopardy clause. JamesMLane 19:15, 24 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Also, although a hung jury results in a mistrial, which leaves open the possibility of a new trial on the same charge, prosecutors frequently forgo that option because of the expense of trial and due to calculations about the likelihood of a conviction at a second trial. SS451 19:19, Jun 21, 2005 (UTC)

He was not acquitted in the 60's... it was a hung jury... so double jeopardy doesn't apply.

If so, the article should be changed, because it says that he was acquitted. Hermitage 21:30, 21 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Sentence length

Odd that there's no mention of it on this page... Coolgamer 22:55, Jun 21, 2005 (UTC)

The jury verdict only just came down. The normal procedure in a major criminal case would be that the judge schedules a sentencing hearing, to give both sides time to assemble and present their arguments about what sentence would be appropriate. The actual sentencing would come some time after that. I don't know how fast Mississippi moves on these things, but I wouldn't be surprised if the sentence weren't handed down for several months. JamesMLane 00:24, 22 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Ah, okay. Thanks for the info. Coolgamer 16:24, Jun 22, 2005 (UTC)

"American Baptist" minister" question

User 205.147.225.20 made a change in the link from Killen being an American (as in United States) Baptist minister to being an American (as in American Baptist Association) Baptist minister. Can anyone substantiate this? I believe it to be in error. I have checked their yearbooks, and cannot find mention of Killen - and it does not appear that they even have any churches in that area of Mississippi. If there is not evidence for this, I believe it should be changed. Thanks. - Rlvaughn 02:36, 22 Jun 2005 (UTC)

I could find no evidence that the Smyrna Baptist Church in Union, MS had any association with the American Baptists (of which I am one). As such I have reworded the reference to avoid such confusion in the future. --Dhartung | Talk 20:02, 22 Jun 2005 (UTC)

An editor using the handle Masque of Red Death (now-defunct) changed the article to say that Killen was a "Southern Baptist" minister. That's clearly untrue.

The only Southern Baptist Smyrna Baptist Church in MS is in Hazlehurst, MS, which is over 100 miles away, so it obviously isn't Killen's church. Killen's Smyrna Baptist Church is in Union, MS, about 15 miles south of Philadelpha, MS. Here's the address and phone number:

308 W Jackson Rd, Union, MS 39365

(601) 774-9976

Here's a Google Map / Street View of Smyrna Baptist Church, Union, MS (Newton County); zoom-in and you can read the sign in front. It's close to the border between Newton and Neshoba Counties. Here's a map showing the boundary between Newton County (to the south) and Neshoba County (to the north); you can see that Smyrna Baptist Church is in Newton County.

Here's a list of all the Southern Baptist Churches in Newton County, MS. You can see that the Smyrna Baptist Church in Union, MS is not listed. (Source: http://www.mbcb.org/resources/find-a-church/)

I've been unable to find the denominational affiliation (if any) of that church, so for now I'm going to just delete "Southern Baptist" and leave it as "minister."

NCdave (talk) 07:35, 31 December 2014 (UTC)

Did Killen personally kill the men?

The edit to state -- that Killen was the ringleader, that Roberts did the actual killing, and that Killen claimed to have been at a funeral wake at the time -- was reverted with a claim of vandalism. This claim is false. The sentence -- that says that Killen hunted down the victims -- is problematic. Rather he had others hunt them down. Please check the newspaper articles. Since being admonished ... leave it to someone else to make the correction.

Was he found not guilty of murder?

He was found guilty of manslaughter, yes, but was he also tried for murder? Was the jury free to decide between a guilty-of-murder verdict, a guilty-of-manslaughter verdict, and a not-guilty verdict?

Doesn't manslaughter imply accidental killing? How is that rationalized in this case?? --Hermitage 08:00, 22 Jun 2005 (UTC)

I believe manslaughter means that the person is either accidentally or indirectly involved with the deaths. The evidence only led to the conclusion that Edgar Ray Killen planned the murders and instructed others, but did not kill them himself, therefore, he was "indirectly involved". Coolgamer 16:23, Jun 22, 2005 (UTC)

No, manslaughter means he was criminally responsible for the death, but there wasn't sufficient evidence to prove intent to kill. There are slightly different definitions in each state, though, and I can't be sure what Mississippi law was in 1964. A couple of news stories suggest that MS law uses the felony manslaughter law to include conspiracy to murder. --Dhartung | Talk 20:18, 22 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Do we need this?

"a jury comprised of nine whites and three blacks" seems...? --Joewithajay 08:11, Jun 23, 2005 (UTC)

Maybe we don't "need" it but, from the other side of the world, I found it very interesting. Belated congratulations, Mississippi! Thincat 10:06, 23 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Given the racial politics of the U.S. criminal justice system, alas, it's required information in the U.S. God forbid a mixed-race person should serve on a jury in a high profile case -- the press won't know how to report it. --Kevin Myers 13:04, Jun 23, 2005 (UTC)

Technically, almost any American "black" is mixed race. Funny how the "one drop" rule is only "one way" though ...

But yes, particularly in a case involving racial politics, the racial composition of the jury is considered newsworthy. --Dhartung | Talk 18:33, 23 Jun 2005 (UTC)

I just came to the talk page to comment on this...I suppose there's no way that a footnote could be added to explain why it's necessary, or maybe different wording used? It sticks out somewhat to my eyes. --KharBevNor 01:13, 24 Jun 2005 (UTC)

What I did was add context for the 1967 trial, and made a note (so as not to disrupt the flow) indicating the reason the jury was all white. Ideally this -- all by itself -- will clarify why the racial composition of the 2005 jury was pointed out. I considered different ways of putting a footnote on the 2005 jury, but they all seemed awkward in that they were pointing out a situation that no longer applied. --Dhartung | Talk 18:43, 24 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Photos

I see that a picture of Killen used to be here: a mug shot from the 60's. It was deleted because of improper licensing notations or something like that. Anyhow, I went looking for a picture and couldn't find that mug shot in a way we could certainly use it (except by fair use), and I also found his picture on the MS Corrections page, but they have a draconian copyright notice. Perhaps it would be useful to contact MS Corrections media relations to ask about photos of inmates, or perhaps someone knows the rule. -- ke4roh 22:31, 28 January 2007 (UTC)

Update?

The most recent event mentioned is Killen's transfer from prison to hospital, but that was over two years ago. What is the current situation? 86.136.250.66 (talk) 23:22, 8 September 2008 (UTC)

Interview

Assisting Mitchell were high school teacher Barry Bradford and a team of three students from Illinois. The students persuaded Killen to do his only taped interview (to that point) talking about the crime.

I checked the cited source (i.e. the Archive index at the Wayback Machine). It says:

Three high school students, Allison Nichols, Brittany Saltiel, and Sarah Siegel, worked with the Chaney, Schwerner and Goodman families, to bring about murder charges. [...] Their teacher even interviewed Edgar Ray Killen, the man convicted as the organizer of the murders of Chaney, Schwerner, and Goodman and helped discover the long secret identity of the secret informer!

So did the students persuade Killen to give an interview to their teacher? Rl (talk) 11:40, 19 January 2010 (UTC)

Assessment comment

The comment(s) below were originally left at Talk:Edgar Ray Killen/Comments, and are posted here for posterity. Following several discussions in past years, these subpages are now deprecated. The comments may be irrelevant or outdated; if so, please feel free to remove this section.

This entry is full of factual errors. For example, there was no new evidence in Killen's 2004 murder trial. I edit and publish the weekly newspaper in Philadelphia, Mississippi. Someone needs to set the record straight.

Last edited at 03:21, 15 March 2007 (UTC). Substituted at 14:07, 29 April 2016 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Edgar Ray Killen. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20071227024031/http://www.motherjones.com/news/update/2007/01/jerry_mitchell.html to http://www.mississippiburning.org/
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110607065320/http://www.mdoc.state.ms.us/InmateDetails.asp?PassedId=112906 to http://www.mdoc.state.ms.us/InmateDetails.asp?PassedId=112906

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:52, 20 December 2016 (UTC)

Alleged?

The intro says alleged, but how can that be if a conviction was handed down? – Illegitimate Barrister (talk • contribs), 01:09, 13 July 2018 (UTC)

Misidentification of Killen's Mother?

The article lists Jetta Killen as Edgar Ray's mother. However, my ancestry.com records show that his mother was Mary Etta Hitt (Killen). I am the great grandson of Mary Etta Hitt's sister, Mattie Hitt Barber. https://www.ancestry.com/search/?name=edgar+ray_killen&count=50&location=2&name_x=1_1&priority=usa

Yates (talk) 22:47, 28 August 2020 (UTC)