Talk:Ed Miliband/GA3

GA Reassessment

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Give the changes to the page, I do not believe it meets Point 5. Mtking ^(edits) 01:16, 28 November 2011 (UTC)

There have been very little changes to the article content wise since is was awarded GA status. As to be expected on wikipedia for an unprotected leader of a British political party it gets some vandalism but is well watched and the occasional content dispute - not sufficient imo to remove its GA status. Youreallycan (talk) 15:11, 30 November 2011 (UTC)

Given the talk page debate, the block for edit warring, I do feel it needs to be reviewed. Mtking ^(edits) 05:45, 1 December 2011 (UTC)

The article content and quality is pretty stable actually, the content is stable and since the very recent, September 12 2011, GA award very little has changed. The GA was six weeks ago - it took over six weeks to get a review - little has changed in the content since than - a review so soon is undue. A single tit for tat revert war is not a reason to remove an articles GA status when the majority content is stable. - this is the only British major political party leader article that is not semi protected. Youreallycan (talk) 23:16, 1 December 2011 (UTC)