Talk:Ed Jovanovski/GA1
GA Review
[edit]| GA toolbox |
|---|
| Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: Kaiser matias (talk) 18:03, 23 December 2010 (UTC)
- It is reasonably well written.
- It is factually accurate and verifiable.
- a (references):
b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
- a (references):
- It is broad in its coverage.
- a (major aspects): b (focused):
- a (major aspects):
- It follows the neutral point of view policy.
- Fair representation without bias:
- Fair representation without bias:
- It is stable.
- No edit wars, etc.:
- No edit wars, etc.:
- It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
- a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):
- Overall:
- Pass/Fail:
- Pass/Fail:
Comments: Only a few minor issues:
- "During the regular season, he was encouraged by Panthers management to play more conservatively than he was used to in the OHL." Not sure what it means by "more conservatively" here; I would assume that in the case of Jovanovski, he needed to be more defensive, but it really isn't clear.
- "In November 1996, Jovanovski was suspended three games by the league." Is there any reason for the suspension?
- "In 2001–02, Jovanovski scored a career-high 17 goals, ranking second in the NHL.[26] His 48 points ranked sixth in the NHL and was his highest total as a Canuck." Should clarify that those were the best totals for defenders.
- "He finished with 33 points in 44 games for a career-high 0.75 points-per-game average." Should be referenced.
- Even though he was injured, shouldn't the World Cup be listed in the medal table?
Just fix up those things and it will pass. Kaiser matias (talk) 18:03, 23 December 2010 (UTC)
- Addressed all the above issues with the exception of the three-game suspension in Nov 96. I couldn't find anything online specifying what it was. Would it be better to leave it out if it can't be specified? Orlandkurtenbach (talk) 20:40, 24 December 2010 (UTC)
- Nevermind, found some detail.. just had to include paid articles in my search. All the detail needed in the paid article is in the free preview. Orlandkurtenbach (talk) 20:52, 24 December 2010 (UTC)
- Looks good to me. Well done. Kaiser matias (talk) 01:01, 25 December 2010 (UTC)
- Nevermind, found some detail.. just had to include paid articles in my search. All the detail needed in the paid article is in the free preview. Orlandkurtenbach (talk) 20:52, 24 December 2010 (UTC)
- Addressed all the above issues with the exception of the three-game suspension in Nov 96. I couldn't find anything online specifying what it was. Would it be better to leave it out if it can't be specified? Orlandkurtenbach (talk) 20:40, 24 December 2010 (UTC)