Talk:Ed Cooke (author)

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

Biography: Arts and Entertainment

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by the arts and entertainment work group.

Psychology Low‑importance

	Psychology portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Psychology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Psychology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PsychologyWikipedia:WikiProject PsychologyTemplate:WikiProject Psychologypsychology articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

University of Oxford Low‑importance

	University of Oxford portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject University of Oxford, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the University of Oxford on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.University of OxfordWikipedia:WikiProject University of OxfordTemplate:WikiProject University of OxfordUniversity of Oxford articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Untitled

I feel this page deserves not to be deleted for these reasons: (a) the subject is a memory Grandmaster with a world ranking of 19;[1] (b) the subject is a published author; (c) the subject has written for national UK newspapers The Guardian [2], and The Times. For these three reasons I feel there is no reason why there shouldn't be a page started about the subject, even if the quantity of info available (e.g., date of birth, exact place of birth, etc) for the page started is in the beginning fairly low. P3L3 (talk) 13:41, 3 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Per notability guidelines, a person is not notable for their OWN writings, but for things written about them in independent sources. Nor is a person notable for nineteenth place in a competition, but for a major national or international championship. WikiDan61^ChatMe!_ReadMe!! 13:53, 3 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Here's a page written by an independent source.[3] Maybe it would be a better link than the Amazon link. Also he's come in the top ten of the World Memory Championship for the last three years. If a tennis player had never won an ATP title but had got to the latter stages many times, and was in the world top twenty, you wouldn't dispute that they should have a page on wikipedia would you? P3L3 (talk) 14:04, 3 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The reference you provided would be better, as it shows some notability (although not exactly favorable notability). As for the comparison to a tennis player, I think one also needs to take into account the notability of the competition as well. While the ATP tennis championships are generally notable for the amount of press coverage they receive, and therefore the competitors who rise to the top level of that sport are notable by virtue of receiving a good deal of press coverage, memory competitions are generally NOT the subject of a great deal of independent press coverage (be that fair or not), and therefore, the competitors in those competitions do NOT receive the same notability. WikiDan61^ChatMe!_ReadMe!! 14:30, 3 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I agree that the comparison with tennis is not a fair one, but still think that since this is a world competition that requires genuine skill, and is not in any way 'more for fun' (e.g., pie throwing), or subjective (e.g., best Christmas decorations) then enough people will still classify it as a serious achievement, even if it doesn't get or deserve broad coverage. P3L3 (talk) 14:58, 3 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed for deletion

This does not appear to be about anyone notable, particularly because of the complete lack of reliable sources referring to the subject. Really should be speedied, but another editor objected to the tag I placed. -- Scjessey (talk) 15:50, 3 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

"Ed Cooke (author" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect Ed Cooke (author has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 March 3 § Ed Cooke (author until a consensus is reached. Utopes _{(talk / cont)} 18:20, 3 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]