Talk:Ed, Edd n Eddy/GA1

GA Review

I'm putting this on hold for now. The article, in my opinion, is a mess, but I don't think it's quite beyond repair.

• "Premise" section is totally unsourced.
• "one of the last, if not the last, of the original Cartoon Cartoons still on the air." Is this acceptable phrasing?
• "It is currently the longest-running original cartoon on Cartoon Network." I've been told not to use "currently". Perhaps "as of 2008"?
• Overview is mostly unsourced as well.
• Original research in many places ("similar to Squigglevision", everything pertaining to pop culture references, AKA appearances), etc.
• Characters: Can this be summarized in prose instead of a list?
• Awards and nominations are unsourced.
• Surely there's more critical reaction than this.
• "Other Works" section is unsourced.
• Most references are not formatted with {{cite web}}. There are other problems with the formatting of references as well.
• Is reference 1 (which is also references 2 and 4) reliable? What about reference 11?
• Overall, I think there should be much more to say than this. The article seems too short for GA class.

Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • ^{(Broken clamshells• Otter chirps • HELP!)} 18:56, 30 July 2008 (UTC)

• Despite Shnitzel's Treelo's efforts to pretty up this article over the past week, I have to fail it for now. There are significant portions that are still unsourced, and some issues with original research and tone. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • ^{(Broken clamshells • Otter chirps • HELP)} 17:43, 5 August 2008 (UTC)