Talk:Ecorse Road

	U.S. roads portal This redirect is within the scope of the U.S. Roads WikiProject, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to state highways and other major roads in the United States. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.U.S. RoadsWikipedia:WikiProject U.S. RoadsTemplate:WikiProject U.S. RoadsU.S. road transport articles
Locations	Michigan

Untitled

added the fact the road never gose to ecorse

Ecorse Township

The Road doesn't make it to Ecorse the City, but the road does run right through what used to be ecorse township. The old Township of Ecorse used to encompass, Southgate, Taylor and parts of Allan Park, and Deaborn Heights, not to mention the City of Ecorse. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 65.220.16.62 (talk) 06:49, 5 March 2007 (UTC).[reply]

OR

I tagged this article as containing original research. It has no sources or external links for that matter. If someone can source it, add them and remove the tag Stratosphere|Talk 04:26, 27 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion

This article is still unsourced. It should be deleted or improved. Another option is to merge it into M-17. --Imzadi1979 (talk) 04:27, 27 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You can start with [1]. --NE2 00:13, 28 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

There's no mention of Ecorse Road there at all. --Imzadi1979 (talk) 00:46, 28 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Ecorse Road is US 12 there: [2] --NE2 01:04, 28 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

That still doesn't explain how the rest of the road is notable at all as a state highway. the project scope for WP:MISH is for State Trunklines only. the minor portion of Ecorse that carries the US 12 or M-17 designations is not enough alone to justify its inclusion in MISH. It is better served only being tagged as part of WP:USST if not outright deleted or merged into other articles. If you feel it should stay, I suggest you clean the article up to much higher standards. --Imzadi1979 (talk) 01:31, 28 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

If you're not interested in it, leave it alone. It's a historic high-speed roadway and belongs in the project best suited to cover those. --NE2 02:08, 28 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]