Talk:Economic sanctions

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject International relations, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of International relations on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.International relationsWikipedia:WikiProject International relationsTemplate:WikiProject International relationsInternational relations articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Trade High‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Trade, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Trade on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.TradeWikipedia:WikiProject TradeTemplate:WikiProject TradeTrade articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Politics Mid‑importance

	Politics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Economics Low‑importance

	Business and economics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Economics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Economics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EconomicsWikipedia:WikiProject EconomicsTemplate:WikiProject EconomicsEconomics articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 31 August 2021 and 25 December 2021. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Afrikkee.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 20:26, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 26 January 2021 and 4 March 2021. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Icarrion1224, Sara.moore2020, Juliastephens.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 20:05, 16 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Upshot?

so what economic sanctions that have worked and if not why didn't they work? South Africa? Not sure that the sanctions did end apartheid...

No, the sanction were also half heartedly applied. The late former CIA funded journalist Brian Crozier writes in his memoirs 'Free Agent'

they were only applied half heartedly. That was my impression, too, visiting there in 1977. Crozier says something about needing them and I think he might have meant 2 things: the platinum and the mercenary outfit that could be hired for 'operations' all over Africa.

In Venezuela the sanctions seem to have worked because the country is half destroyed, so there they have been a success. In Russia the sanctions have not been successful and I do not think they ever will be. Russians are tough people, the country is big and has a powerful neighbour. This means not all countries can be destroyed, or drummed into obedience through sanctions to initiate regime change. 2001:8003:AC60:1400:1052:1011:CAE:ED24 (talk) 05:52, 25 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Were the Iraq trade sanctions designed to bottle up the oil remaining in Iraq for future use by who ever took control of the country as oil supplies begin to dwindle? They seem unusually harsh just for punishment over the Kuwait invasion...

The people havd a write and a demand to see ME!

What exactly are you trying to say here? 167.206.48.221 (talk) 17:57, 2 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Comprehensive list

It would be interesting to list all countries currently subject to economic sanctions. -- Beland (talk) 16:35, 25 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

It would be. Lets do it then. 167.206.48.221 (talk) 17:53, 2 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Could economic sanctions against the USA be possible?

Would it be possible to impose economic sanctions against the USA? 86.176.190.13 (talk) 03:47, 1 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

It has the largest military industrial complex that humanity has ever known- it's military spending is half of the worlds. I'm guessing if someone tried, they would be "liberated", and have whatever resources they were withholding, just taken.

Steel Tariff 2002. EU was going to do it and USA backed down from its tariff. So yea, it is possible. 167.206.48.221 (talk) 17:55, 2 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

-G — Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.159.20.254 (talk) 05:40, 2 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Merge from Embargo

An embargo is just a particularly strong form of economic sanctions, and there's no clear dividing line between the two. There is a large amount of content overlap (examples, rationale, assessment of effectiveness) and very little (explanation of vocabulary) that does not. I would like to merge the articles so we can take advantage of the contributions to both in a single, unified form, and make progress faster since less work will be required than doing this in two different places. -- Beland (talk) 02:01, 26 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Beland: Is "embargo" considered to be synonymous with "economic sanctions", according to any expert on this subject? Jarble (talk) 22:47, 7 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Jarble: Sure, this expert piece uses the two words as synonyms. The dictionary definition of sanction encompasses non-economic prohibitions, which is also true of the some of the meanings in the dictionary definition of embargo. But the article embargo only deals with economic embargoes (not say embargoing of a press release, which is a common usage in journalism). So the content of embargo is a good candidate for merging with economic sanctions but not the other articles linked from the disambiguation page sanction or the intro of international sanctions.

Various parties have compared the definitions [1] [2] [3] and they seem to agree that "embargo" can be "complete" (which might be implied if there is no modifier) or "partial" (usually explicitly specified) while "sanctions" does not imply the degree to which trade is restricted unless further specified by other words. More authoritative sources could probably be found, but these explanations agree with how I hear those words used in the news media. -- Beland (talk) 16:39, 15 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Agreed and

Done Klbrain (talk) 18:27, 23 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 2 external links on Economic sanctions. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers. —^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 23:48, 18 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Economic sanctions. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/20100723132200/http://www.nguoi-viet.com:80/absolutenm/anmviewer.asp?a=116316&z=5 to http://www.nguoi-viet.com/absolutenm/anmviewer.asp?a=116316&z=5

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 01:46, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Economic sanctions. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100607153959/http://students.law.umich.edu/mjil/article-pdfs/v29n2-howse-genser.pdf to http://students.law.umich.edu/mjil/article-pdfs/v29n2-howse-genser.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:59, 19 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Economic sanctions. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120618123903/http://www.crimesofwar.org/a-z-guide/blockade-as-an-act-of-war/ to http://www.crimesofwar.org/a-z-guide/blockade-as-an-act-of-war
Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.economicexpert.com/a/Continental%3Apolicy.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:38, 4 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Economic sanctions. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100218045356/http://www.berr.gov.uk/whatwedo/europeandtrade/strategic-export-control/sanctions-embargoes/by-country/india-pakistan/index.html to http://www.berr.gov.uk/whatwedo/europeandtrade/strategic-export-control/sanctions-embargoes/by-country/india-pakistan/index.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:52, 16 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The continuous embargos of The Cold War

Hi. I am missing solid information in this article about the continuous embargos between the Eastern and the Western blocs during the Cold War. If someone wants to help, then please join in on this issue. RhinoMind (talk) 19:14, 6 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Soft merge

I am going to comment in large amounts of content from Weaponization of finance, an article that I am dubious should even exist, given that it is almost exclusively tied to political consultant Ian Bremmer, whose company has been creating articles about him and his ideas for well over a decade (see here for evidence and links to the COI noticeboard discussion). My goal is to edit that information gradually and integrate it into the article appropriately, given that Weaponization of finance does have some decent descriptions of economic sanctions (literally under a section titled Economic sanctions...) WhinyTheYounger (talk) 01:05, 16 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Does withholding MFN count as sanctions?

I personally think so but I'm not sure. I have a source here. It states that MFN is the rule rather than the exception, and - with exceptions - MFN was withheld from the Communist countries during the Cold War. Can thus withholding MFN count as sanctions/economic warfare? Source here. Transylvania1916 (talk) 21:34, 23 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Unwieldy article

The overwhelming majority of the article is devoted to specific sanctions implemented by the US and a few other countries. This means that the article almost takes on the form of a listicle, which is not particularly pleasant to read. Relatively little space is devoted to explaining the general history, functioning and efficacy of sanctions. Snooganssnoogans (talk) 00:40, 13 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

How to raise the article's content assessment grade?

Why is the article's content assessment grade is C?

What should be done to raise it's content assessment? (e.g. what topics are missing? What are the problems? Galaranty (talk) 06:58, 1 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Wiki Education assignment: Political Economy of War and Peace

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 29 August 2023 and 18 December 2023. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Tzurkowski, Shreyaaherr, JBDUwiki, JaylinChampion (article contribs). Peer reviewers: Shreyaaherr.

— Assignment last updated by Muhammadmir1 (talk) 17:11, 18 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

section on effectiveness of sanctions

I propose to rework the section on the effectiveness of sanctions by clarifying and streamlining some points as well as adding additional sources.Blaze Droste1977 18:31, 26 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]