Talk:Economic Partnership Agreements

	European Union portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject European Union, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the European Union on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.European UnionWikipedia:WikiProject European UnionTemplate:WikiProject European UnionEuropean Union articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Trade

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Trade, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Trade on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.TradeWikipedia:WikiProject TradeTemplate:WikiProject TradeTrade articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Economics

	Business and economics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Economics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Economics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EconomicsWikipedia:WikiProject EconomicsTemplate:WikiProject EconomicsEconomics articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Law

	Law portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Dr. Hufbauer's comment on this article

Dr. Hufbauer has reviewed this Wikipedia page, and provided us with the following comments to improve its quality:

1. The term EPA is used more widely than as between EU and the erstwhile ACP countries. Japan for example uses the term in some of its arrangements. A Google search should reveal other uses. The biggest is the Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership (RCEP) between around 20 Asian countries.
2. The leading purpose of the term is to skirt by the requirements (under the GATT) of a free trade agreement. In particular, tariffs may not be eliminated on substantially all trade. Other forms of cooperation may be poured into an EPA framework -- for example, aid, cultural exchanges, etc. 3. Nothing in an EPA "prevents" one of the partners from opening its markets unilaterally or engaging in FTAs or EPAs with other countries. 4. The EU EBA, like the US GSP, is basically a one-way free trade deal -- a bigger step away from reciprocity than an EPA. The rules of origin question is a distraction from this central point.
3. Strict reciprocity is generally not part of the EPA menu.

We hope Wikipedians on this talk page can take advantage of these comments and improve the quality of the article accordingly.

Dr. Hufbauer has published scholarly research which seems to be relevant to this Wikipedia article:

Reference : Gary Clyde Hufbauer & Jared C. Woollacott, 2010. "Trade Disputes Between China and the United States: Growing Pains so Far, Worse Ahead?," Working Paper Series WP10-17, Peterson Institute for International Economics.

ExpertIdeas (talk) 03:47, 29 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on Economic Partnership Agreements. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:53, 16 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]