Talk:Economic Calculation in the Socialist Commonwealth

Economics Low‑importance

	Business and economics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Economics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Economics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EconomicsWikipedia:WikiProject EconomicsTemplate:WikiProject EconomicsEconomics articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Books

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Books. To participate in the project, please visit its page, where you can join the project and discuss matters related to book articles. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the relevant guideline for the type of work.BooksWikipedia:WikiProject BooksTemplate:WikiProject BooksBook articles

Politics: Libertarianism Low‑importance

	Politics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Libertarianism portal This article is supported by WikiProject Libertarianism (assessed as Mid-importance).

Central Planning

von Mises argument is not from calculation but from planning, central planning. Thus, Cockshott's and Caplan's criticisms collapse into a heap of burned kindling. The final disintegrated cinder is the reference to Turing.

Turing's claim was not as stated on the film based on his life that a computer can be "like a brain". His claim is, a computer can be the same as the brain. These are 2 counts against the neurological argument - and that is what the case is - one day there will be a computer that does what Turing claimed will be but, best of all, will super-cede many brains.

To say that Turing meant many brains in one brain to deal with only economics (the claim entails that force) adds more nonsense to the stinking dung piled up by and since Turing, as brilliant as he was.

On economics, Caplan and Cockshott compound Turing's nonsense by appealing to trivia.

The crunch is, central planning is impossible. Attempts to impose central planning entails economic destitution for millions and rests on totalitarianism to impose it. I am acquainted with professors who quit the assumptions of socialism, and the myth of perfect competition and Keynesian poison, because they, independently, drew the same conclusions. 1.145.161.117 (talk) 14:44, 1 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Central Planning is impossible

s 1.145.161.117 (talk) 15:08, 1 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]