Talk:Ecology of Tasmania

Australia: Tasmania / Biota Mid‑importance

	Australia portal Ecology of Tasmania is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.AustraliaWikipedia:WikiProject AustraliaTemplate:WikiProject AustraliaAustralia articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Tasmania (assessed as High-importance).
	This article is supported by WikiProject Australian biota (assessed as Mid-importance).
	Need help improving this article? Ask a Librarian^{What's this?} at the National Library of Australia, or the State Library of Tasmania.
	The Wikimedia Australia chapter can be contacted via email to helpwikimedia.org.au for non-editorial assistance.

insects

are there ants? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 96.41.249.21 (talk) 00:59, 22 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

good sandbox articles with images

i found some sandbox pages of more or less inactive enwiki users:

User:Alisterhaz: Tasmanian alpine vegetation communities and the effect of fire (also see Alpine vegetation of Tasmania)
User:Yipingchen: Ecology of Tasmanian cool temperate rainforest bryophytes
User:Yoshiaki_Kohno: Succession after Disturbance in Tasmanian Lowland Vegetation

the contents look valueable and there are some good images. maybe someone can make use of these pages? Holger1959 (talk) 22:42, 9 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Flora and fauna of Tasmania. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120426080629/http://www.tarkine.com.au/ to http://www.tarkine.com.au/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:29, 26 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Flora and fauna of Tasmania. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130507191242/http://www.premier.tas.gov.au/__data/assets/pdf_file/0006/148164/tasmanian-forest-agreement-verification.pdf to http://www.premier.tas.gov.au/__data/assets/pdf_file/0006/148164/tasmanian-forest-agreement-verification.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:08, 2 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Flora section, second paragraph: "The Tarkine..."

I have a few problems with this paragraph, but particularly its prominent position as the second paragraph of the section, especially given the lack of reliable references and the use of nonsensical terms such as "Gondwanan rainforest" to describe extant vegetation.

In my opinion also the purpose of this part of the article should be to describe the flora of Tasmania in general terms, not its vegetation, which is summarised further down and also adequately described in articles such as Variation of Tasmanian vegetation from East to West and Alpine vegetation of Tasmania.

The paragraph smacks of having been placed here for political purposes, so if there is no objection I propose removing it altogether. MFdeS (talk) 01:11, 6 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Given that there's no objection these past 2 weeks, I'll remove the section. MFdeS (talk) 01:01, 19 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]