Talk:Echinognathus/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Simongraham (talk · contribs) 13:31, 3 August 2021 (UTC)

• This is a very well-written article that only needs minor adjustments to be GA.

Thank you :) Ichthyovenator (talk) 09:09, 4 August 2021 (UTC)

• "endognathary" – I feel that this could be in violation of WP:TECHNICAL in the lead. I suggest either replacing the word with something less technical or giving greater prominence to the definition, maybe with an explanation of how it is used to handle the food (as long as this can be substantiated from a verified source).

I've added that it means it was used to handle food. Ichthyovenator (talk) 09:09, 4 August 2021 (UTC)

• "appendage" – is repeated with proximity in the second paragraph. Is there a synonym that could be used?

I've replaced two instances of "appendage" with "limb". Ichthyovenator (talk) 09:09, 4 August 2021 (UTC)

• The lead seems very short. I suggest that it could be expanded based on the verified data in the main body.

I've expanded the lead a bit. Ichthyovenator (talk) 09:09, 4 August 2021 (UTC)

Excellent work. I will complete the assessment. simongraham (talk) 15:04, 4 August 2021 (UTC)

Assessment

1. Comprehension: The comprehension is good.
Pass

Criteria	Notes	Result
(a) (prose)	The prose is generally clear, concise and understandable.	Pass
(b) (MoS)	The article is compliant with the manual of style.	Pass

2. Verifiability: The article is verifiable.
Pass

Criteria	Notes	Result
(a) (references)	The article has a list of references and in-line citations for its contents in the body.	Pass
(b) (citations to reliable sources)	Sources used are reliable.	Pass
(c) (original research)	No original research found.	Pass
(d) (copyvio and plagiarism)	No flagrant copyright issues found with Earwig's Copyvio Detector.	Pass

3. Comprehensiveness: The article is comprehensive.
Pass

Criteria	Notes	Result
(a) (major aspects)	The article broadly covers all major aspects.	Pass
(b) (focused)	The article is focused without unnecessary deviations.	Pass

4. Neutrality: The article is neutral.
Pass

Notes	Result
The article is compliant with the policy on neutral point of view.	Pass

5. Stability: The article is stable.
Pass

Notes	Result
No ongoing content disputes or edit wars present.	Pass

6. Illustration: The article is well illustrated.
Pass

Criteria	Notes	Result
(a) (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales)	No copyright issues found, images are appropriately tagged.	Pass
(b) (appropriate use with suitable captions)	Use and captions are good.	Pass

7. Overall: Pass/fail.
Pass

Notes	Result
Congratulations, Ichthyovenator. This article meets the criteria to be a Good Article.	Pass