Talk:Ecgric of East Anglia/GA1
Appearance
GA Review
[edit]GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: Lemurbaby (talk) 11:29, 23 July 2011 (UTC)
- Is it reasonably well written?
- A. Prose quality:
- Please do expand the lead slightly (two full paragraphs would be an appropriate length).
- Done. --Hel-hama (talk) 19:36, 23 July 2011 (UTC)
- "The form of the name Sigeberht supports" - unclear. Why?
- Hopefully this is clearer - I've made a few changes. --Hel-hama (talk) 20:08, 23 July 2011 (UTC)
- "After 633 the Northumbrian situation was stabilised under Oswald of Northumbria, and East Anglia shared with Northumbria the benefits of the Irish missions of Fursey and Aidan." Please elaborate.
- For in-text citations, the format is more typically like this:
- Lastname (year), p. X
- I wish to retain the style I have used already, as eminent Wikipedeans such as Ealdgyth use a very similar style to the one I have used in the article and I have modelled my editing on them up to now. Happy to change if you insist! --Hel-hama (talk) 20:59, 23 July 2011 (UTC)
- Fair enough. :) No need to change it. Lemurbaby (talk) 22:55, 23 July 2011 (UTC)
- I wish to retain the style I have used already, as eminent Wikipedeans such as Ealdgyth use a very similar style to the one I have used in the article and I have modelled my editing on them up to now. Happy to change if you insist! --Hel-hama (talk) 20:59, 23 July 2011 (UTC)
- for multi-page ranges in in-text citations, instead use n-dashes: Lastname (year), pp. X–XX
- fixed. --Hel-hama (talk) 20:59, 23 July 2011 (UTC)
- For all number ranges (pages or years etc) use n-dashes: X–XX
- fixed. --Hel-hama (talk) 20:52, 23 July 2011 (UTC)
- Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
- Please replace "Citations needed" tags with citations.
- Done, relevant sentence was altered so as to fit in with the citation used, but was still about the cooperation between the 2 Churches. --Hel-hama (talk) 17:59, 23 July 2011 (UTC)
- B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:
- C. No original research:
- Is it broad in its coverage?
- A. Major aspects:
- B. Focused:
- Is it neutral?
- Fair representation without bias:
- "East Anglia lapsed into paganism" - this is not entirely neutral. How about "reverted"?
- Fixed. --Hel-hama (talk) 17:22, 23 July 2011 (UTC)
- Is it stable?
- No edit wars, etc:
- Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
- A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
- B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions: {{GAList/checkyes
- Overall:
- Pass or Fail:
- Pass or Fail:
Comments
[edit]Excellent work on an underrepresented area of Wikipedia. Thank you for contributing your time and energies! Just a few minor changes above and this will be ready to be awarded GA. Lemurbaby (talk) 12:02, 23 July 2011 (UTC)