Talk:Ecce Homo (exhibition)

Untitled

I edited this article to remove recently added language that makes radical claims about the controversy without citing any sources. The previous edit changed the tone of the article to suggest that the Christian community was uniformly against the display, and that all letters of support came from "liberal atheists". I highly doubt this was true, but in any event, such a charged statement as this would require a reputable source to support it and no contradictory sources (e.g. one Christian who wrote a letter of support).

Fair use rationale for Image:Ecce Homo photo 6.jpg

Image:Ecce Homo photo 6.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 07:30, 2 January 2008 (UTC)

Factual error

The Baptism of Jesus exhibit clearly shows Jesus as being uncircumcised. If Jesus was Jewish, he would have had a bris.

It's not so clear to me, from the internet version. Johnbod (talk) 14:01, 23 February 2009 (UTC)

Cut or uncut, it seems absurd for the greatest controversy to be over the depiction of Christ's genitalia. From what we know to be customary about crucifixion, Christ's nude body would have been publicly displayed for quite some time.drone5 (talk) 00:58, 10 July 2009 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Ecce Homo (exhibition). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070928075327/http://www.ohlson.se/utstallningar_ecce.htm to http://www.ohlson.se/utstallningar_ecce.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:01, 4 December 2017 (UTC)