Talk:Ebeneezer Goode

Nonsense?

It's not nonsense. Try Googling for the title, Wikipedian. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Dubiousdavel (talk • contribs) .

Comment refers to speedy deletion of article when content was "E's ever so good, he's Ebeneezer Goode." Fair and correct deletion as that's apparently nonsense, but of course the song is notable - a controversial number one hit single by a notable band. --kingboyk 20:26, 6 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Lyrics

Aside from ‘Eezer Goode sounding identical to “E’s are good”, the line “He’s Ebeneezer Goode” sounds identical to “these effing E’s are good”, which was the the first thing I noticed when I first heard the track. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 80.194.235.138 (talk) 17:06, 25 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Frame grab

A frame grab (one only per rules) from the video would be nice, showing Mr Goode, if anyone can oblige. --kingboyk 20:27, 6 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Reference to Jerry Sadovitch should possibly be to Jerry Sadowitz, who already has a wiki entry... —This unsigned comment was added by 172.202.201.92 (talk • contribs) .

Well there ya go, according to that article you are right. You could have just gone ahead and changed it yourself :) but thanks indeed for the headsup. --kingboyk 12:42, 19 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, I'm pretty new to this 8) Plus I couldn't access the "official" Jerry Sadowitz website to get verification: having seen the video, all I could swear to was that it looked a bit like him. 172.202.1.73 00:09, 21 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

"Got any salmon?"

The line is far more likely to refer to "salmon roe" or "blow". In the UK, and particularly Scotland, "blow" refers to cannabis rather than cocaine as it does in the US. Gordonjcp (talk) 23:56, 2 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The TOTP performance...

The punning claim that they made a gratuitous rug reference and replaced Veras with underlay is contradicted by this, a video the show on which they appeared, in which they still say 'Veras.' --It's-is-not-a-genitive 18:51, 9 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

It's possible they performed the song on the show more than once. It's also possible the author got it wrong ("got any underlay?" is on the radio sessions CD, after all). The difficulty is that we merely report what the sources say (WP:NPOV, WP:RS), and that book (apparently) says it was on Top of the Pops.

That said, it's pretty trivial anyway; it might be best to just remove the claim altogether. --kingboyk 18:57, 9 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Trivial? No, really? Indeed there was more than one performance; in this one you can hear 'underlay' [1]. I don't have the Bussman book, but presume it's a more reliable reference than the subject's interview by the Guardian. So the article is fine on this. Now, my pointless suggestion for an improvement, for any muso with the sources, is about the recording. Where is the 'naughty, naughty, very naughty' sample from? It sounds so much like Ken Campbell. --Cedders^tk 15:36, 12 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Sales retraction

i am under the impression that the band withdrew the single from sales after 4 weeks at number one, which may be worth mentioning, however i cant source this other than the bands own literature from way back in the mid nineties. can anyone help?--Princekilderkin (talk) 02:16, 3 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Beavis and Butt-head, favorable?

Their "commentary" when they watch the video didn't seem particularly favorable to me, mainly Beavis repeating "naughty naughty" over and over in a fake British accent then getting freaked out and screaming at the visuals of the video until he has a seizure.99.130.31.150 (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 01:29, 16 May 2010 (UTC).[reply]

Removed reference to...

... line "I've done a log in my undies" as I've been unable to verify it. Suspect this plus comment about it being 'the act of releasing feces by dancing while on drugs' is anti-drug propaganda. Please provide ref and I'll reinstate. 2.98.245.56 (talk) 19:27, 18 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Ebeneezer Goode. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive http://www.webcitation.org/5hFf8iFDu?url=http://www.irishcharts.ie/search/placement to http://www.irishcharts.ie/search/placement

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:08, 19 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Vera Lynn

Is this not in reference to gin, as opposed to skin. Hĭ uông lìng (talk) 00:10, 7 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]