Talk:Eazy-E/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: 12george1 (talk) 17:24, 6 January 2011 (UTC)

Lead

• Everything in the lead meets the criteria, IMO, so I will pass it

Early Life

• Delink words that are already in the lead, such as "Compton, California", "Los Angeles", and "Ruthless Records".

• Fixed CrowzRSA 21:49, 7 January 2011 (UTC)

• "In 1986, at the age of 23, Wright had allegedly earned as much as $250,000 from dealing drugs." - that money value is the first mention of US Currency, right? Link United State dollar on either "$" or add pipelink it as USD in parenthesis, e.g. $250,000 (USD).

• Fixed CrowzRSA 21:49, 7 January 2011 (UTC)

Musical Career

• Some words are over linked again: "Ruthless Records", " Dr. Dre", and "Ice Cube"

• Fixed CrowzRSA 21:49, 7 January 2011 (UTC)

Legal issues

• Pass

Death

• Pass

Musical influences and style

• Over linking again on the first line alone, delink: "Ice-T", "Redd Foxx", "King Tee", "Bootsy Collins", "Run-D.M.C.", "Richard Pryor", "The Egyptian Lover", "Schoolly D", "Too $hort", "Prince", "The Sugarhill Gang", and "George Clinton". Further into the section: "Eazy-Duz-It", "Ice Cube, The D.O.C., and "MC Ren" (twice in the third paragraph), "The D.O.C.", "MC Ren". In the legacy section: "Billboard 200", "Eazy-Duz-It", and "Real Muthaphuckkin G's".

• Fixed CrowzRSA 21:49, 7 January 2011 (UTC)

Discography

• Pass

References

• Don't write the title in all capital, like correct #53 "ABOUT THE OFFICIAL HIP HOP HALL OF FAME AND PRODUCER JT THOMPSON"

• Fixed CrowzRSA 21:49, 7 January 2011 (UTC)

• Some of the references don't have accessdates, I am not talking about the references to books and magazines, I mean the refs that are online. Example, there are no accessdates for the following references:
  • Ref #3
  • Ref #5
  • Ref #6; also why does the published date read "2006-03-2006", rather than "2006-03-26"?
  • Refs #9 - #11
  • Ref # 16
  • Ref # 27
  • Ref # 29
  • Ref # 35
  • Ref # 38
  • Ref # 53
    • Template:Cite web says that retrieval date "should be given if the publication date is unknown", so I only fixed #11. CrowzRSA 21:49, 7 January 2011 (UTC)

Conclusion

1. It is reasonably well written.

   a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):

2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.

   a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):

3. It is broad in its coverage.

   a (major aspects): b (focused):

4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.

   Fair representation without bias:

5. It is stable.

   No edit wars, etc.:

6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.

   a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

7. Overall:

   Pass/Fail: