Talk:Eating mucus

Psychology Mid‑importance

	Psychology portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Psychology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Psychology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PsychologyWikipedia:WikiProject PsychologyTemplate:WikiProject Psychologypsychology articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Health and fitness Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Health and fitness, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of health and physical fitness related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Health and fitnessWikipedia:WikiProject Health and fitnessTemplate:WikiProject Health and fitnessHealth and fitness articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Ideal sources for Wikipedia's health content are defined in the guideline Wikipedia:Identifying reliable sources (medicine) and are typically review articles. Here are links to possibly useful sources of information about Eating mucus.

PubMed provides review articles from the past five years (limit to free review articles)
The TRIP database provides clinical publications about evidence-based medicine.
Other potential sources include: Centre for Reviews and Dissemination and CDC

Removed "advantages" section and other poorly referenced parts

Quotations were from "lifestyle" articles in the same category as "LEARN HOW TO LOSE 30 POUNDS IN 2 WEEKS" and etc. Quotations and outlandish claims by individual doctors does not and cannot make for established fact. Rest of article needs pruning, as it's written much in the style and with the referencing habits of a high school essayist. Article may need to be merged with another that has a broader scope.--Rawnoodles10 (talk) 10:59, 12 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I removed all (remaining?) references to "benefits"; they all seem to go back to one Austrian country doctor talking about a pet theory of his in an interview with the local media (see e.g. on Hoaxes.org). Maybe there has been some scientific research or serious claims on that matter, but I did not find any. Piramidon (talk) 14:27, 30 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

It's 2018 and that advantages section should really be reinstated. Marushka23 (talk) 06:01, 6 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Merging with booger article

Upon re-reading article, the entire thing can be put into a short paragraph on the "dried nasal mucus" page. I don't think this warrants discussion, just read the old editions and tell me if that looks like a proper wiki article to you. I'm merging it immediately. Rawnoodles10 (talk) 11:15, 12 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose, This is a notable subject and there is mountains of information to be covered. Marcus Qwertyus 11:20, 12 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Support, What mountains, "some people (mostly children) eat boogers, you can damage the nose if it's excessive, but it's not that big of a deal otherwise" cite and boom, everything is covered. Rawnoodles10 (talk) 11:24, 12 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

You forgot all the health aspects, social stigma and the history. Marcus Qwertyus 12:24, 12 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Come to think of it - indeed this article is unnecessary. Grown people who eat boogers have a pathological craving for attention - that's a psychological stand on this issue in its basis, so the cure is to show those people that such method to achieve it doesn't produce the desired effect and is desperately futile thereby. Thus - merge the article. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 178.223.65.15 (talk) 15:31, 16 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I cleaned up the reference error on this page. Is this page really necessary, though? Is a page on butt-scratching next? Perhaps there is a page on "Things to do when no one is looking" with which this material can be merged. Does the Encyclopædia Britannica also cover this material?Jihadcola (talk) 22:39, 10 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Support I do not see how this article would contain anything that cannot be covered as a section on the dried nasal mucus page. TheOriginalSoni (talk) 09:42, 4 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]