Jump to content

Talk:Eastern freshwater cod

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Someone changed the word "species" to "sub-species" a while back. I changed it back because - please note - Eastern Freshwater Cod are FULLY SEPARATE species of Maccullochella cod, NOT a sub-species.

Codman 06:08, 17 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

"Daily Examiner" article

[edit]

Hi Codman! While that 1935 article is interesting and good info, it seems a little excessive to quote the complete thing here - that's an entire screen worth of (small-type) quotation, while the original is directly accessible via the link provided. I would like to reduce that somewhat to a one-paragraph summary (possibly with a short quote) and the link. Whatcha think?--Elmidae (talk) 08:28, 9 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah sure. I'm not great with coding and stuff, so why don't you give it a go? Codman (talk) 11:29, 9 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
@Codman: Before I get to that... It appears the "Conservation" section is entirely without references. However, from the edit history I see that you added a large number of references without connecting them to the text (as inline refs). That is rather crucial - it does the reader no good to have a huge batch of references at the end of the article without any idea which statement they are connected to. They might just as well not be there in that case :) Could you please link these refs to the text as inline refs (using ref tags)? Since you already know what refers to what, you are the only one who can do it without major extra effort. Then I'll condense the quote and prettify.--Elmidae (talk) 14:11, 9 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Yeah, OK. The problem is I never really learnt how to do the coding stuff. But I can figure out referencing -- just. Slow and painful though, it is. Codman (talk) 05:49, 10 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
If you'd like, I can do the polishing - I only need to know which reference pertains to which text block. You could do this: just take each reference in its entirety, as it appears in the ref list now, and put it between ref tags at the end of the sentence or paragraph in question, like so:
<ref>Anon. (2004). New South Wales Eastern (Freshwater) Cod (Maccullochella ikei) Recovery Plan. New South Wales Department of Fisheries, Port Nelson, New South Wales, Australia.</ref>.
Which will look ugly, but I can then turn them into a well-formed list.--Elmidae (talk) 08:48, 10 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Eastern freshwater cod. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:27, 19 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]