This disambiguation page is within the scope of WikiProject Asia, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Asia on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AsiaWikipedia:WikiProject AsiaTemplate:WikiProject AsiaAsia articles
This disambiguation page is within the scope of WikiProject Mongols, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Mongol culture, history, language, and related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MongolsWikipedia:WikiProject MongolsTemplate:WikiProject MongolsMongols articles
This disambiguation page is within the scope of WikiProject Ethnic groups, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles relating to ethnic groups, nationalities, and other cultural identities on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Ethnic groupsWikipedia:WikiProject Ethnic groupsTemplate:WikiProject Ethnic groupsEthnic groups articles
This disambiguation page is within the scope of WikiProject Disambiguation, an attempt to structure and organize all disambiguation pages on Wikipedia. If you wish to help, you can edit the page attached to this talk page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project or contribute to the discussion.DisambiguationWikipedia:WikiProject DisambiguationTemplate:WikiProject DisambiguationDisambiguation articles
Buryat and Khalkha people might have been called "Eastern" when compared to Oirat, but has anyone called them thus when referring to one of these two groups exclusively? And if so, how long back in time did this take place? I think this disambiguation page might be somewhat misleading else. But I wouldn't mind if there are good references. G Purevdorj (talk) 12:24, 29 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Well, no literature was provided. The problem with the original article might just have been that it didn't conjoin the first three groups. You can only be Eastern if somebody else is western, of course, and the regrouping takes care of that. The new wording might still be sub-optimal, though. G Purevdorj (talk) 07:18, 31 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]