Talk:East Rembo

	Philippines portal This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Tambayan Philippines, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics related to the Philippines on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Tambayan PhilippinesWikipedia:WikiProject Tambayan PhilippinesTemplate:WikiProject Tambayan PhilippinesPhilippine-related articles
Low	This redirect has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.

Contested deletion

This page should not be speedy deleted as an unambiguous copyright infringement, because... (A simple Edit will fix this, just remove the part. And just delete the history to ensure that no other copy is available. There are many other options that Delete. That's what we did on John Florentine Page ) --Ploreky^{Have a chat?(contribs)} 08:37, 27 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Revdel

The page is still somewhat paraphrased, though in the event that WP:G12 is declined I've tagged revdel. Thanks. VickKiang (talk) 08:53, 27 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

It's not paraphrased, I just used some of the words and parts of sentence on what I made. But Thanks also Ploreky^{Have a chat?(contribs)} 09:03, 27 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your reply. The article has two phrases that appear to be somewhat problematic. The History of East Rembo started in 1954 when the PAF authorized the construction of Barrios for the reserved military serving in the armed forces who were living in Fort Bonifacio. East Rembo is the heart of the three barangays of West Rembo, Comembo and Pembo is a bit similar with the source text, In 1954, the Philippine Armed Forces through the Office of General Alfonso Arellano, commanding General of Fort Bonifacio authorized the construction of settlements for enlisted men serving in the armed forces who were based in Fort Bonifacio. Geographically, East Rembo is at the heart of three barrios namely.

Though overall I don't think it's unambiguous enough for a G12, except this sentence the article, while close with the source in its structure, isn't terrible. Many thanks. VickKiang (talk) 09:07, 27 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]