Talk:East Indies theatre of the French Revolutionary Wars/GA1
Appearance
GA Review
[edit]GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: Tomandjerry211 (alt) (talk · contribs) 23:27, 10 August 2015 (UTC)
Will start soon.--Tomandjerry211 (alt) (talk) 23:27, 10 August 2015 (UTC)
- It is reasonably well written.
- Its supposed to be BrE, but its possible a spellcheck error or two crept in. I can't find them though, can you let me know were this is a problem?--Jackyd101 (talk) 23:21, 16 August 2015 (UTC)
- "traveled" and "defense".--Tomandjerry211 (alt) (talk) 10:52, 17 August 2015 (UTC)
- Fixed myself.--Tomandjerry211 (alt) (talk) 12:00, 18 August 2015 (UTC)
- Duplicate links to French Revolution, Dutch Cape Colony, Penang, HMS Victorious, HMS Arrogant, HMS Sybille, HMS Fox, HMS Sceptre, Houghly River, HMS Jupiter, and HMS Tremendous.
- Ok, I've eliminated the second on French Revolution, which was an error. However, the rest of these are relatively obscure links which appear in very different sections and I think that a reader would prefer to have these links where they are. As far as I understand it, the overlinking rules are guidelines subject to editor discretion rather than definitive instructions, and I'd prefer to leave these as they are.--Jackyd101 (talk) 23:21, 16 August 2015 (UTC)
- Split the first paragraph in the lead.
- Remove the location parameter in an image if it says "right".
- I've done this, but I'm not entirely sure why it was necessary. What was harmed by leaving the "rights" in place?
- It is factually accurate and verifiable.
- a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
- Citation #115 should be a note
- a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
- Its debateable, but in every other article I've used this metric, including some featured articles, this has gone in the references (as its a reference to a source rather than commentary). I'd rather keep it where it is.
- Sources #4 and #7 in the bibliography should have the "ref=harv" parameter removed
- It is broad in its coverage.
- a (major aspects): b (focused):
- a (major aspects): b (focused):
- It follows the neutral point of view policy.
- Fair representation without bias:
- Fair representation without bias:
- It is stable.
- No edit wars, etc.:
- No edit wars, etc.:
- It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
- a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- First two images in article lack U.S PD tags
- a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- Overall:
- Pass/Fail:
Thanks for the review, I've left a number of comments and questions - if I haven't queried the point, its been addressed. Best--Jackyd101 (talk) 23:21, 16 August 2015 (UTC)
- Passing, Well done.--Tomandjerry211 (alt) (talk) 12:00, 18 August 2015 (UTC)