Talk:Earthsea (universe)

Novels: Fantasy Low‑importance

	Novels portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Novels, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to novels, novellas, novelettes and short stories on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and contribute to the general Project discussion to talk over new ideas and suggestions.NovelsWikipedia:WikiProject NovelsTemplate:WikiProject Novelsnovel articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by Fantasy task force.

Women writers Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women writers, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of women writers on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women writersWikipedia:WikiProject Women writersTemplate:WikiProject Women writersWomen writers articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Gebbeth was nominated for deletion. The discussion was closed on 12 June 2009 with a consensus to merge. Its contents were initially merged into Earthsea, and later moved to Earthsea (universe). The original page is now a redirect to this page. For the contribution history and old versions of the redirected article, please see its history; for its talk page, see here.

Should be merged

The topic and contents of this page, and much of the actual text, are substantially the same as those of Earthsea -- compare Earthsea#Setting and Earthsea (universe)#Geography -- and should be merged into it. @P64: what do you think? Thnidu (talk) 04:11, 19 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

No, they should be split further.

The other article Earthsea should be about the Earthsea series --mainly fantasy literature but including fictional reference material (Tales part 5) and nonfiction (Tales foreword, Earthsea Revisioned, probably other lectures or essays). The universe/world/archipelago, reception, adaptations should be summarized there but covered elsewhere. As for Narnia=>The Chronicles of Narnia, also Harry Potter, Dragonriders of Pern.

Much of that article should be imported to this article Earthsea (universe), or curtailed or deleted there if it is already here; and vice versa. Compare Narnia (world), also Harry Potter universe and Pern.

--P64 (talk) 15:32, 19 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@P64: You've convinced me. But I'm not ready to do it; that's a pretty big project. --Thnidu (talk) 15:33, 20 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Earthsea (universe). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110717214649/http://www.ursulakleguin.com/GedoSenkiResponse.html to http://www.ursulakleguin.com/GedoSenkiResponse.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:25, 19 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Direct Quotation Should be Replaced

Following Wikipedia's tenet of neutrality and efficiently summarizing information, the majority of direct quotation on this page should be removed. The importance of this article should act as a summary and instead of including direct quotations the statement should be a summary and use an appropriate citation to the source. Whether this is referencing an article or a specific book it is important to also have them referenced in the actual references section and not the bibliography. The Harry Potter Universe page (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fictional_universe_of_Harry_Potter) offers a good example and template.

Carlsontemple (talk) 14:11, 30 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]