Talk:Earnings management

Earnings management has been listed as one of the Social sciences and society good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Review: January 31, 2014. (Reviewed version).

A fact from Earnings management appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 20 January 2014 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:

Did you know... that earnings management involves the alteration of financial reports to mislead stakeholders, and may be difficult for individual investors to detect?

A record of the entry may be seen at Wikipedia:Recent additions/2014/January. The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Earnings management.

Wikipedia

Business: Accounting Mid‑importance

	Business portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Business, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of business articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BusinessWikipedia:WikiProject BusinessTemplate:WikiProject BusinessWikiProject Business articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Accounting task force.

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:Earnings management/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Cirt (talk · contribs) 03:40, 31 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I will review this article. — Cirt (talk) 03:40, 31 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Stability review

Article edit history going back over one year looks fine.
Talk page edit history going back to talk page inception similarly has no problems.

— Cirt (talk) 03:53, 31 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Image review

File:Hauptbuch Hochstetter vor 1828.jpg = only image used in article. Image hosted on Wikimedia Commons. Checks out alright there on image page. Y.

— Cirt (talk) 04:57, 31 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Successful good article nomination

I am glad to report that this article nomination for good article status has been promoted. This is how the article, as of January 31, 2014, compares against the six good article criteria:

1. Well written?: Writing quality is good for GA standards.

2. Factually accurate?: Duly cited throughout to appropriate sources.

3. Broad in coverage?: Covers major aspects. Sure there's room for expansion in the future, but not necessary at this point for this particular article for GA.

4. Neutral point of view?: Article is written in a neutral tone. Matter of fact wording and presentation throughout.

5. Article stability? See my comments on this, above, passes here.

6. Images?: See my comments on this, above, passes here.

If you feel that this review is in error, feel free to take it to Good article reassessment. Thank you to all of the editors who worked hard to bring it to this status, and congratulations.— — Cirt (talk) 20:47, 31 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Peer review

Should we subject this article to peer review? Lbertolotti (talk) 15:13, 12 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Earnings management. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120905162446/http://www.csus.edu/indiv/l/lundbladg/ACCY%20113/113_WA/SEC%20Sharply....pdf to http://www.csus.edu/indiv/l/lundbladg/ACCY%20113/113_WA/SEC%20Sharply....pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:34, 27 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]