Talk:Early medieval literature

Middle Ages High‑importance

	Middle Ages portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Middle Ages, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Middle Ages on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Middle AgesWikipedia:WikiProject Middle AgesTemplate:WikiProject Middle AgesMiddle Ages articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Literature High‑importance

	Literature portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Literature, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Literature on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LiteratureWikipedia:WikiProject LiteratureTemplate:WikiProject LiteratureLiterature articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

This article originally conflated the 6th to 9th centuries because there wasn't enough material for standalone articles by century. As material accumulates, it could well be split into four separate articles based on 10th century in literature and seqq. The same considerations apply to the ancient literature article. --dab (𒁳) 12:55, 24 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Discover this!

Could be a New-Age angle? It seems to stem from Edward Sapir, to create this idea of classical language, on Wikipedia, but whose idea is it to extend this vision to the term 'medieval literature'? It is a good way to deconstruct, in practice, the always oldfashioned periodizations, but is that the intention? Not to mention the expertise required to include all global regions in what could otherwise, boringly traditional, have been an attempt to describe the literature in the early middle ages, obviously from the European region.

It's not that I reject the challenge - although as an editor I do reject the challenge - but it is simply a misnomer to use the phrase early medieval literature to describe global literature in a chronographic periodization. Sort of, if not wholly an expression of cultural imperialism, not to forget the above mentioned active deconstruction of the already complex medieval studies.

The challenge is real enough. Would it not be worthwhile to consider a different periodization for this sort of globalization? For example, in millenia: Text evidence earlier than the 1st millenium BC; Text evidence 1st millenium BC - 1st millenium AD; Text evidence 2nd millenium AD - present.

I must admit that I am not at the moment planning to do anything, I just think the article is fatal enough to justify comment 'out of the blue' :) Sechinsic (talk) 14:52, 1 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]