Talk:Eagles Guidelines

Notability

I am not sold on the notability of the article. A Google search didn't really sway me either. The reason I am coming here is that the Google search included the word "Eagle", which can bring up an array of results. Are there any other sources that could be incorporated? CurlyPop88 (talk) 01:12, 14 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move 15 May 2020

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

It was proposed in this section that Eagles Guidelines be renamed and moved to Linguistic categories.

result:
Procedural close. It would appear to be inappropriate to actually rename this Stub article to the proposed title, which is a developed article. The current title's Stub article should be proposed for deletion per CSD, PROD or AFD, whichever is appropriate. Before the deletion, any needed content can be merged into the section at Linguistic categories#Multilingual annotation schemes, and the hatnote over that section's content can then be updated. (nac by page mover) P.I. Ellsworth ed. ^put'r there 17:16, 16 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Links: current log • target log

This is template {{subst:Requested move/end}}

Eagles Guidelines → Linguistic categories – Merge and move with EAGLES paragraph under Linguistic_categories#Multilingual_annotation_schemes. Reason: The article writes about EAGLES in present tense, and apparently hasn't been updated since the project finished (20 years ago). This is relevant, though, but should be presented along with other approaches on linguistic categories (many of which were influenced by EAGLES). Chiarcos (talk) 15:39, 15 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.