Talk:Eagle's Nest Tunnel and Sha Tin Heights Tunnel

Hong Kong Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Hong Kong, a project to coordinate efforts in improving all Hong Kong-related articles. If you would like to help improve this and other Hong Kong-related articles, you are invited to join this project.Hong KongWikipedia:WikiProject Hong KongTemplate:WikiProject Hong KongHong Kong articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Hong Kong To-do:

Attention needed (60)

...needing expert attention (4) • ...without infoboxes (18)

Collaboration needed

Recommend topic

Improvement needed

GA-Class articles (60) • B-Class articles (295)

Cleanup needed

C-Class articles (1,054)

Image needed (348)

Destub needed

Start-Class articles (5,475) • Stub-Class articles (6,684)

Deorphan needed

...orphans

Page creation needed

Requested articles

Miscellaneous tasks

...maintain popularity • ...assess the un-Class (388) • ...assess the un-Importance (1,337)

Bridges and Tunnels Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Bridges and Tunnels, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of bridges and tunnels on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Bridges and TunnelsWikipedia:WikiProject Bridges and TunnelsTemplate:WikiProject Bridges and TunnelsBridge and Tunnel articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Merge proposal

I propose that Sha Tin Heights Tunnel be merged with Eagle's Nest Tunnel (this page), into a new page titled similar to the Chinese page (zh:尖山隧道及沙田嶺隧道, Eagle's Nest Tunnel and Sha Tin Heights Tunnel). The reasons are that:

the two pages can be summed up into one article, and would merit more notability that way
the two structures are essentially counterparts
zhwiki and zh-yuewiki (the sole translations) each have one page for these tunnels, and doing this on enwiki as well would be less confusing Jc86035 (talk) 16:05, 18 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
[EDIT] it would be easier to translate information as there is much more information in the zhwiki article, and the two enwiki ones have not had major improvements since the opening of the tunnels Jc86035 (talk • contributions) 04:01, 15 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

sounds good. Frietjes (talk) 14:44, 14 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not so sure. These are two different tunnels being described, through two different hills. And although the page layout is similar the information is different, too. I'd be inclined to leave them separate. Moonraker12 (talk) 13:21, 15 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

One thing to bear into consideration is that wikidata allows only a single article in each wiki to be linked to the same item. At present only this article is linked to the zh article, whichever is decided we should co-ordinate this pan wiki, a merge here and at zh-yue or a split at zh.--KTo288 (talk) 04:35, 14 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Merge. --Why should I have a User Name? (talk) 16:02, 5 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I've completed the merge to a new page name, combining the names of both tunnels Done