Talk:Each-way

Gambling Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Gambling, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Gambling on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.GamblingWikipedia:WikiProject GamblingTemplate:WikiProject GamblingGambling articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

An editor has requested that an image or photograph be added to this article.

WikiProject Gambling To-do:

Current collaborations:

Improve an article to FA

Improve an article to A

Help with the Gambling articles needing attention.
Tag the talk pages of Gambling-related articles with the {{WikiProject Gambling}} banner.
The link to the Missouri gambling site is now out of date and needs to be updated.
Japan section reads as though it was written by the gambling industry - quotes of 160% returns are 'citation needed'.

Opening comment

What is the purpose of this article? It is not clear what type of wagering game this article covers. If it is meant to describe a type of bet in a particular game such as Craps, then the information belongs in the Craps article. SmartGuy 17:11, 20 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I didn't make the articles, but the user has made several on various bookmaking bets. I combined some duplicates, and added the bookmaking clarification here. Taken together the articles would make the bookmaker article pretty long, so a few (sensibly combined) other articles would seem to make sense (though I know next to nothing about bookmaking). 2005 23:15, 20 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I suspected as much. Someone who has little knowledge of gambling but happens to stumble across this article will likely be highly confused as to what exactly is the subject matter. SmartGuy 13:45, 21 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Capitalisation?

Is the W supposed to be capitalised? I've always written it "each-way". Loganberry (Talk) 14:54, 28 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Blacklisted Links Found on the Main Page

Cyberbot II has detected that page contains external links that have either been globally or locally blacklisted. Links tend to be blacklisted because they have a history of being spammed, or are highly innappropriate for Wikipedia. This, however, doesn't necessarily mean it's spam, or not a good link. If the link is a good link, you may wish to request whitelisting by going to the request page for whitelisting. If you feel the link being caught by the blacklist is a false positive, or no longer needed on the blacklist, you may request the regex be removed or altered at the blacklist request page. If the link is blacklisted globally and you feel the above applies you may request to whitelist it using the before mentioned request page, or request it's removal, or alteration, at the request page on meta. When requesting whitelisting, be sure to supply the link to be whitelisted and wrap the link in nowiki tags. The whitelisting process can take its time so once a request has been filled out, you may set the invisible parameter on the tag to true. Please be aware that the bot will replace removed tags, and will remove misplaced tags regularly.

Below is a list of links that were found on the main page:

http://fbg.ladbrokes.com/en/sports-terms/sports-betrules-genrules/sports-betrules-racing#20
Triggered by \bladbrokes\.com\b on the global blacklist

If you would like me to provide more information on the talk page, contact User:Cyberpower678 and ask him to program me with more info.

From your friendly hard working bot.—cyberbot II ^Notify_Online 18:14, 8 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Wrong calculation

Odds 15/2 are 8.5 not 7.5 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sielay (talk • contribs) 08:40, 13 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]