Talk:E chart

	Medicine portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Medicine, which recommends that medicine-related articles follow the Manual of Style for medicine-related articles and that biomedical information in any article use high-quality medical sources. Please visit the project page for details or ask questions at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Medicine.MedicineWikipedia:WikiProject MedicineTemplate:WikiProject Medicinemedicine articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Ophthalmology task force.

Requested move

The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: page moved. Vegaswikian (talk) 20:00, 11 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

E Chart → E chart –

Well, I may be wrong, but we have Snellen chart, lower case (except in the title) on this page, which you'd expect to be right, and here, used generically. The "E" clearly should be capped, since it refers to the first cap in the chart itself. Per WP:MOSCAPS ("Wikipedia avoids unnecessary capitalization") and WP:TITLE, this is a generic, common term, not a propriety or commercial term, so the article title should be downcased. $Tony (talk)$ 10:51, 4 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

Latin alphabet

The article claims that, "This chart is useful for patients who are unable to read the Latin alphabet". This is not the only use for it. Some patients have seen the Snellen chart so many times that reading it will involve some level of recognition of letter sequences (though not necessarily deliberate recall), which distorts the result of the measurement. The E chart is less likely to linger in memory and is therefore also used as an alternative to the Snellen chart. (Unfortunately, I don't have any references for this. The risk of memory effects is implicit it this discussion.) --ChristopheS (talk) 15:57, 18 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]