EVO 2 DX was nominated for deletion. The discussion was closed on 08 October 2012 with a consensus to merge. Its contents were merged into EVO 2. The original page is now a redirect to this page. For the contribution history and old versions of the redirected article, please see its history; for its talk page, see here.
This article was nominated for deletion on 30 September 2012. The result of the discussion was redirect.
An image used in this article, File:EVO 2.jpg, has been nominated for speedy deletion at Wikimedia Commons for the following reason: Copyright violations
What should I do?
Don't panic; deletions can take a little longer at Commons than they do on Wikipedia. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion (although please review Commons guidelines before doing so). The best way to contest this form of deletion is by posting on the image talk page.
If the image is non-free then you may need to upload it to Wikipedia (Commons does not allow fair use)
If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale then it cannot be uploaded or used.
An image used in this article, File:EVO 2 on official site.png, has been nominated for speedy deletion for the following reason: Wikipedia files with no non-free use rationale as of 21 December 2011
What should I do?
Don't panic; you should have time to contest the deletion (although please review deletion guidelines before doing so). The best way to contest this form of deletion is by posting on the image talk page.
So, in the charity section, it talks about giving away free EVO 2's to victims of natural disasters and whatnot. However, the system was delayed and yet to be released? Did this not happen then? Or will it still happen in the future? Or did they get prototype units or something? This should probably be clarified, and rewritten to reflect what actually ended up happening... Sergecross73msg me19:44, 30 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
I deleted it. A Christmas came and went without news of any consoles donated. I left the blurb but edited it a little for the primary corporate article. -Kai445 (talk) 16:54, 31 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
I support that, I was close to doing the same when I originally wrote that half a year ago. I suppose one could argue that it could be mentioned that they said they were going to do this, but I don't especially find that to be noteworthy, and would prefer keeping it out at this point. Sergecross73msg me17:08, 31 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
I felt the same way, so I changed it to "plans to act" instead of saying that they "are" acting charitably. I agree that it may not be notable, but I don't feel strongly one way or the other. If you wanted to delete it, I'd support it. -Kai445 (talk) 21:30, 31 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]