Talk:EU–US Free Trade Agreement

	European Union portal This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject European Union, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the European Union on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.European UnionWikipedia:WikiProject European UnionTemplate:WikiProject European UnionEuropean Union articles
Low	This redirect has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Organizations Mid‑importance

	This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Organizations, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Organizations on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.OrganizationsWikipedia:WikiProject OrganizationsTemplate:WikiProject Organizationsorganization articles
Mid	This redirect has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Economics Mid‑importance

	Business and economics portal This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Economics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Economics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EconomicsWikipedia:WikiProject EconomicsTemplate:WikiProject EconomicsEconomics articles
Mid	This redirect has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

United States Low‑importance

	United States portal This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This redirect has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

International relations Mid‑importance

	This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject International relations, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of International relations on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.International relationsWikipedia:WikiProject International relationsTemplate:WikiProject International relationsInternational relations articles
Mid	This redirect has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Trade High‑importance

	This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Trade, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Trade on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.TradeWikipedia:WikiProject TradeTemplate:WikiProject TradeTrade articles
High	This redirect has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Essay-like tone

The article is written like an essay, rather than an encyclopaedia article. "Those of us trained in economics pay attention to the role of incentives in all areas of life." is a particularly choice quote. 46.7.236.155 (talk) 10:35, 19 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I agree. Except for the introduction, the article should be deleted (WP:POV and bad sources).--Olag (talk) 13:20, 16 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I also agree. Can we get this page deleted? Below are some examples of irrelevant parts.

" When one looks at the indicators of corruption and respect for rule of law, the United States and Western Europe, despite their problems, score much better than the rest of the world". How is this relevant? In the Competition from BRICS section there is talk again about the rule of law in these countries. How is this relevant? In the Trade as a Tool for Growth section: "Enhancing economic development in Europe and the United States, where civil societies have not given up their efforts to live under equality before the law, is essential" Again not relevant. NrH (talk) 14:51, 16 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

it reads badly because it was plagerised from [1]. IRWolfie- (talk) 13:41, 29 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright problem removed

Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources, specifically this forbes article. Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you. IRWolfie- (talk) 13:47, 29 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]