Talk:ETA Systems

Computing Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComputingWikipedia:WikiProject ComputingTemplate:WikiProject ComputingComputing articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by Computer hardware task force.

On ETA Systems Naming

I was part of the group that named ETA. It was pretty simple. ETA was definitely from the first three letters of ETAOIN SHRDLU, what we remembered as the linotype character output that had been based on the nytimes research that made the awful linotype keyboards. There is not really any debate about that, so I'm unclear what the 'competing theories' would be from. ETA, as a name, was selected but it was decided from the start that it was not an acronym, partially just to be contrary, which the ex-CDC engineers and executives who left to form ETA were most definitely feeling.

It wasn't until well after the name was chosen that the Basque connection was realized ("oops") or the Japanese-language issue, but there were a number of amusing connections found to the name. A number of names were discussed, but Neil Lincoln and his family were the source for the name of the company.

Another anecdote about naming

My 9th grade computer programming class toured ETA Systems just a few months before they shut down. During the Q&A session, someone asked what the name meant. The employee who was acting as our tour guide (no idea who it was) told us that the name was not an initialism, but was simply the three most commonly used letters in the English language.65.101.108.194 (talk) 17:50, 19 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:ETA logo.gif

Image:ETA logo.gif is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 02:58, 3 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I added a fair use rationale, source, and discussion of copyright status to the image page. —Ryanaxp 16:13, 4 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Adjective choice

The choice of some adjectives on this whole page come close to violating neutral point of view. If things were "excellent," it's questionable the firm would have failed as it did. This is mindful that the best technology does not always "win." But that's merely one example. The page needs considerably more work by knowledgeable people from that era and/or historical evidence from some place like the Charles Babbage Institute (near what was ETA HQ). This is merely a call for more realistic verbage. 143.232.210.150 (talk) 21:57, 13 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]