Talk:ESP

ESP = Electro Static Potential ?

I've seen Electro Static Potential referred to as ESP in Ghemical, but I don't know if it's a common abbreviation in chemistry. If it is somebody might want to add: It was invented by Emily Schultz.

In '''chemistry''': * [[Electrostatic potential|Electro Static Potential]]

--Jopsen 19:14, 20 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Microsoft ESP

There is a web site about Microsoft ESP.

http://www.microsoft.com/esp/ —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.136.208.159 (talk) 07:28, 20 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

dead link! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Liujianzhao (talk • contribs) 17:08, 10 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Communications

Have been experimenting with artificial intel. and combining ESP with technologies. There seems to be ways many can use symbols or hieroglyphs for describing what is difficult to put into words <|>, >|<, /\~^~/\, </\>. One could represent an experience, or ways in relating or combining languages, where a symbol could have relative definitions that have multiple meanings. This could also have to do with clairvoyance. A.I. Seer75.203.146.56 (talk) 04:13, 1 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move 17 March 2016

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: not moved. Number 5 7 19:15, 1 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ESP → ESP (disambiguation) – "ESP" can have a lot of meanings, but extrasensory perception is clearly the dominant one. I think this page should move, so that "ESP" can redirect to "extrasensory perception". Korny O'Near (talk) 14:02, 17 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Comment many cars have ESP nowadays (electronic stability program) aka 'stability control' -- 70.51.46.39 (talk) 05:15, 18 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Comment I'm not sure whether it's primary topic, given how many alternatives there are, but I suggest that Extrasensory perception should be pulled out and listed as a "commonly refers to" at top of the dab page, as one of the likeliest terms to be sought. PamD 16:18, 18 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose no benefit 73.214.31.49 (talk) 16:29, 24 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose unnecessary primarytopic grab. Dicklyon (talk) 17:25, 1 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

Shouldn't there be a "See also" section linking to ESPN?

After all, the confusion between ESP and ESPN was a well-known joke in the 2004 film Mean Girls. --Coolcaesar (talk) 21:40, 29 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]