Talk:ESATAp

is esatap actually a standard?

My searches find a lot of user help sites but nothing official. If it is a standard does anyone know what the official name for it is? Plugwash (talk) 12:51, 10 September 2010 (UTC)

Yeah... is anyone actually using this? Thanks. ---Ransom (--208.25.0.2 (talk) 21:45, 15 October 2010 (UTC))

Hello, great thing to extract the eSATAp-Part and put it onto an single article. I can contribute some (official) links for you, maybe this will be helpful.

http://www.gigabyte.com/microsite/68/tech_090814_p55_f-esata.htm
http://micro.msi.com/poweresata/
http://us.toshiba.com/computers/research-center/technology-guides/esata-usb-port

http://www.delock.de/mail/esatap/esatap.html
http://www.tragant.de/produkte/index.php?mainSeite=http://www.tragant.de/produkte/showsuchkennzeichen_poes_a19.html?setPicSize=1
http://www.lian-li.com/v2/en/product/product06.php?pr_index=416&cl_index=2&sc_index=10&ss_index=19&g=f
http://www.lian-li.com/v2/en/product/product04.php?cl_index=2&sc_index=6&ss_index=121
http://www.addonics.com/emerging_technologies/euhp.asp
http://www.addonics.com/products/flash_memory_reader/AEPDDESU.asp

(Angerdan (talk) 11:40, 8 December 2010 (UTC))

Do any of those links indicate that ESATAp is an actual device standard, as opposed to just two different ports jammed together? Kufat (talk) 22:47, 9 January 2011 (UTC)

I see lots of package advertising products but no links to specifications. Plugwash (talk) 16:20, 20 February 2012 (UTC)

I was under the impression that the more unofficial of the variants would be 'dual-power' (aka. "PD") but that the eSATA-USB standard itself was an officially recognized one. Daesin (talk) 12:21, 20 February 2022 (UTC)

esatap in laptop

Somethning is wrong with implementation section. It says eSATAp cannot be fit into laptop. But why? Nothing prevents it, it will just supply 5V. It is also just usefull even without additional power, as it essentially combines usb and esata port, thus using less space, and also allows devices to draw power from eSATAp's USB connector instead of using additonal Y-cable to USB power. Additionally article explicitly shwows Laptop with eSATAp port. So it is contradiction. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 91.213.255.7 (talk) 13:48, 28 August 2011 (UTC)

File:61862-USB3-eSATAp.jpg Nominated for speedy Deletion

An image used in this article, File:61862-USB3-eSATAp.jpg, has been nominated for speedy deletion for the following reason: All Wikipedia files with unknown copyright status What should I do? Don't panic; you should have time to contest the deletion (although please review deletion guidelines before doing so). The best way to contest this form of deletion is by posting on the image talk page. If the image is non-free then you may need to provide a fair use rationale If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale, then it cannot be uploaded or used. If the image has already been deleted you may want to try Deletion Review This notification is provided by a Bot --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 16:24, 2 October 2011 (UTC)

Some notes for me

• "External Serial ATA" (PDF). Silicon Image, Inc. Retrieved 8 August 2009.

File:Esatap.jpg Nominated for speedy Deletion

An image used in this article, File:Esatap.jpg, has been nominated for speedy deletion at Wikimedia Commons for the following reason: Copyright violations What should I do? Don't panic; deletions can take a little longer at Commons than they do on Wikipedia. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion (although please review Commons guidelines before doing so). The best way to contest this form of deletion is by posting on the image talk page. If the image is non-free then you may need to upload it to Wikipedia (Commons does not allow fair use) If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale then it cannot be uploaded or used. If the image has already been deleted you may want to try Commons Undeletion Request This notification is provided by a Bot --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 22:12, 2 October 2011 (UTC)

File:6182b.jpg Nominated for speedy Deletion

An image used in this article, File:6182b.jpg, has been nominated for speedy deletion at Wikimedia Commons for the following reason: Copyright violations What should I do? Don't panic; deletions can take a little longer at Commons than they do on Wikipedia. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion (although please review Commons guidelines before doing so). The best way to contest this form of deletion is by posting on the image talk page. If the image is non-free then you may need to upload it to Wikipedia (Commons does not allow fair use) If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale then it cannot be uploaded or used. If the image has already been deleted you may want to try Commons Undeletion Request This notification is provided by a Bot --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 22:13, 2 October 2011 (UTC)

File:Esatap-on-notebook.jpg Nominated for speedy Deletion

An image used in this article, File:Esatap-on-notebook.jpg, has been nominated for speedy deletion at Wikimedia Commons for the following reason: Copyright violations What should I do? Don't panic; deletions can take a little longer at Commons than they do on Wikipedia. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion (although please review Commons guidelines before doing so). The best way to contest this form of deletion is by posting on the image talk page. If the image is non-free then you may need to upload it to Wikipedia (Commons does not allow fair use) If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale then it cannot be uploaded or used. If the image has already been deleted you may want to try Commons Undeletion Request This notification is provided by a Bot --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 22:13, 2 October 2011 (UTC)

File:Port-compare-esatap.jpg Nominated for speedy Deletion

An image used in this article, File:Port-compare-esatap.jpg, has been nominated for speedy deletion at Wikimedia Commons for the following reason: Copyright violations What should I do? Don't panic; deletions can take a little longer at Commons than they do on Wikipedia. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion (although please review Commons guidelines before doing so). The best way to contest this form of deletion is by posting on the image talk page. If the image is non-free then you may need to upload it to Wikipedia (Commons does not allow fair use) If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale then it cannot be uploaded or used. If the image has already been deleted you may want to try Commons Undeletion Request This notification is provided by a Bot --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 22:13, 2 October 2011 (UTC)

File:Power-eSATA.jpg Nominated for speedy Deletion

An image used in this article, File:Power-eSATA.jpg, has been nominated for speedy deletion at Wikimedia Commons for the following reason: Copyright violations What should I do? Don't panic; deletions can take a little longer at Commons than they do on Wikipedia. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion (although please review Commons guidelines before doing so). The best way to contest this form of deletion is by posting on the image talk page. If the image is non-free then you may need to upload it to Wikipedia (Commons does not allow fair use) If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale then it cannot be uploaded or used. If the image has already been deleted you may want to try Commons Undeletion Request To take part in any discussion, or to review a more detailed deletion rationale please visit the relevant image page (File:Power-eSATA.jpg) This is Bot placed notification, another user has nominated/tagged the image --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 15:58, 20 February 2012 (UTC)

"+12V issue"

What a wall of text... I have no knowledge on the subject, but someone should trim that out. It's really intimidating.

--Lewis82 (talk) 02:35, 22 April 2012 (UTC)

...Perhaps not trim it out completely, but use more efficient wording? 🤔 Daesin (talk) 12:23, 20 February 2022 (UTC)

Merge with SATA

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section. A summary of the conclusions reached follows.

To restructure, creating eSATA from Draft:eSATA and then moving eSATAp material. Klbrain (talk) 09:57, 7 April 2021 (UTC)

---

How come eSATAp gets its own article, but eSATA doesn't? This article doesn't really have enough of a reason to exist, it's just a small footnote for the already somewhat obscure eSATA.— Preceding unsigned comment added by Aluminite (talk • contribs) 23:31, 16 September 2019 (UTC)

Agree with the above unsigned comment. eSATA should be the main article and powered eSATA a section of it. Current setup is even more misleading because this article is the top hit when searching for eSATA in search engines. IdentityCrisis (talk) 17:27, 2 January 2020 (UTC)

Sorry about forgetting to sign my comment. I'm going to make eSATA into its own article now and merge this into it. Aluminite (talk) 04:43, 31 January 2020 (UTC)

I agree with the proposal to merge. Eklir (talk) 20:37, 8 July 2020 (UTC)

@Aluminite: do you still think that eSATA needs it own page ... was looking to sort out the ESATAp merge, but it would be helpful to do this only once to a final target. Klbrain (talk) 09:34, 19 December 2020 (UTC)

@Klbrain: I think having eSATA being its own thing would be a good idea, it was a fairly significant connector back in the late 2000s and the early 2010s. Also, if you search eSATA right now the first result is eSATAp, which isn't exactly right. Aluminite (talk) 16:50, 19 December 2020 (UTC)

Before you can merge eSATAp into eSATA you need to split eSATA from SATA. Someone tried to do this in September 2009, but was reverted: "Reverted to redirect status (06:32, 18 October 2008 Meco); "article" is direct cut-and-paste dupe of sections from main SATA article made 3 days ago with negligible subsequent additions". Of course a WP:Summary style subtopic should never have less detail than its parent article – but it shouldn't be necessary to make subsequent additions to the sub-article if you reduce the parent section you just cut out to a summary of the topic, which wasn't done in 2009. Discussion about this matter is at Talk:Serial ATA/Archive 1#Splitting into a new topic of eSATA. This just needs to be done all-the-way without leaving it half done hoping that someone else will finish the task. – wbm1058 (talk) 21:34, 22 December 2020 (UTC)

I moved the September 2009 draft to Draft:eSATA. That needs an infobox, and other work to update it. eSATAp may be tentatively merged to the draft. Once the draft is a viable article it may be moved back over the top of the eSATA redirect. – wbm1058 (talk) 16:35, 24 December 2020 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Proposal: Rename "ESATAp" to 'eSATA-USB' & paste relevant information to here

(While keeping current sections, like on +12v pd/dual.) Daesin (talk) 12:27, 20 February 2022 (UTC)

• Support - Due to the simplification it would bring, both to the process of 'moving' & to the description of the topic itself. Daesin (talk) 12:31, 20 February 2022 (UTC)

Merge with eSATA

Is this merge actually underway or being worked on? Looks like it's been in the works for about 3 years now. LiterallyDavidBowie (talk) 03:55, 10 April 2024 (UTC)

It seems that everybody is waiting for everybody else to do it instead of doing it themselves, personally i'd prefer to just rename it to eSATA-USB (with a Dual/PD section) and have the eSATA article say "not to be confused with eSATA-USB" in a link (makes more sense & is less hassle) but im good with whatever people willing to do. Dasein (talk) 16:27, 21 November 2024 (UTC)