Talk:ERAM
 | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||
| ||||||||
External links modified (January 2018)
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on ERAM. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120927081205/http://www.faa.gov/air_traffic/publications/atpubs/FAC/0610.html to http://www.faa.gov/air_traffic/publications/atpubs/fac/0610.html
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20131019050744/http://www.faa.gov/about/office_org/headquarters_offices/ato/artcc/chicago/ to http://www.faa.gov/about/office_org/headquarters_offices/ato/artcc/chicago/
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:46, 26 January 2018 (UTC)
advert maintenance tag dropped
[edit]I deleted the {advert} maintenance tag.
Advertising seeks to sway decisions. Descriptions of ERAM improvements may have been part of advertising to the governmental agencies choosing between competing systems; but that context is past; it's not the context here. Those choices are now part of public policy DEFINING normative operations. Now, descriptions of improvements do not seek to persuade or sway decisions; they EXPLAIN the rationales for decisions already made.
That was true when the {advert} tag was added. I'll leave it to readers to infer the reasons for the tagging. LoneStarNot (talk) 14:38, 6 June 2022 (UTC)