Talk:EMedicine

This article was nominated for deletion on 7 October 2009. The result of the discussion was keep.

Medicine Low‑importance

	Medicine portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Medicine, which recommends that medicine-related articles follow the Manual of Style for medicine-related articles and that biomedical information in any article use high-quality medical sources. Please visit the project page for details or ask questions at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Medicine.MedicineWikipedia:WikiProject MedicineTemplate:WikiProject Medicinemedicine articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Status re: Articles for deletion

Interested parties should be aware of and refer to the discussion on Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/EMedicine.

I personally feel that this page should be moved to eMedicine.com and that this page be retained as a disambiguation page; probably with introductory content to assist in directing users to more detailed content on related pages dealing with what is often called colloquially as e-Medicine, i-medicine, e-Health, etc. Also as others have noted, there are 19 other languages linked to this page, so care needs to be made (in case of a page relocation) to ensure that this other language links are adjusted if, and as, appropriate.
Enquire (talk) 05:22, 13 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Template

In case you didn't know, there is a template here: Template:EMedicine
Enquire (talk) 06:49, 14 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Clarification

Re. "studies";

"12% of radiology residents" and "114 sites rated it the second-highest Internet-based source of information" - where were these people from? Who conducted this survey? At the moment, this is unclear and somewhat misleading. Chzz ► 11:29, 16 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You'd have to check the source - it's attributed to a peer-reviewed article. WLU (t) (c) Wikipedia's rules:^simple/_complex 19:53, 23 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]