Talk:EMD F3

Trains Portal

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Trains, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to rail transport on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. See also: WikiProject Trains to do list and the Trains Portal.TrainsWikipedia:WikiProject TrainsTemplate:WikiProject Trainsrail transport articles

Mid

This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Associated projects or task forces:
/
	This article is supported by the Locomotives task force.

F10?

I see a few references to the F10 model of the F-series, but no explanation of what sets the F10 apart from an F9. Nor can I find a separate article on the F10. Anyone know the difference and care to add it to the article? --Badger151 19:17, 7 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

F10 wasn't an EMD designation but was named by the rebuilder after major work. There are articles here on GP8, CF7, SD26, and others, all rebuilder types. Maybe there should be a category for these non-EMD names. Meggar 03:15, 8 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

F3 Demonstrators

The writer of the current article has completly ignored the F3 Demonstrators. The first set was built by EMD in July 1945. The second set of demonstrator F3s was built in September 1946. See http://utahrails.net/ajkristopans/FREIGHTCABUNITS.php for production dates. --SSW9389 (talk) 00:12, 26 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The original four unit F2 demonstrator #291A1, 291B1, 291B2, 291A2 was built in July 1945. The new F2 was supposed to be a 1500 horsepower machine. But EMD could not get the full 1500 horsepower rating out of the new D12 generator in the demonstrators. The F unit production line was shut down in November 1945 with the last FTs built and EMD intended to produce the new units in 1946. But EMD did not produce another F unit until July 1946 because of the problems with the D12 generator. The F2 as-built was offered by EMD as a 1350 horsepower unit with the old D8 Generator to fill the needs of a few railroads that wanted freight diesels and could not wait for EMD to work the bugs out of the D12 generator. When the D12 generator was able to be rated at 1500 horsepower the new F3 model was announced and the F2 demonstrators became F3s. See "EMD's F2 - An Interim Model" by Warren Calloway, Dan Cupper, and Paul Withers from Diesel Era Volume 7 Number 2 March/April 1996, pages 31-46 for the complete story. --SSW9389 19:20, 6 January 2012 (UTC)

Production of the new F3 was announced by EMD in late October 1946 with the Santa Fe passenger F3s. See the article "Electro-Motive's F-3" on pages 52-53 in the December 1946 Trains magazine. --SSW9389 (talk) 15:29, 21 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

infobox

Dorin, Patrick C. (1972). Chicago and North Western Power. Superior Publishing. p. 119-121. ISBN 0-87564-715-4. has C&NWRy drawings and spec sheets for their loco’s, that’s where most of this comes from. I used #4051C, weights vary among series.Sammy D III (talk) 03:19, 25 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on EMD F3. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20101026205703/http://railwaymuseum.ab.ca/node/21 to http://www.railwaymuseum.ab.ca/node/21

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:41, 15 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Unit count

Infobox and first paragraph read 1111 A units and 696 B units, but the table of Original owners sums up to 1112 A units and 695 B units … gender transition? 2003:E1:6F49:5900:4059:21D4:263B:F225 (talk) 21:46, 31 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Neither set of figures is referenced; I wouldn't be surprised if they're both wrong. Mackensen (talk) 03:14, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This list seems well-researched. It says 1107+4 A-units and 694+2 B-units … but I'm still trying to find out how many are actually listed ;-) 2003:E1:6F49:5900:A5B7:78B5:3713:72BC (talk) 13:24, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]