Talk:EDO MBM Technology Ltd v Campaign to Smash EDO

Law Low‑importance

	Law portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Palestine Low‑importance

	Palestine portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Palestine, a team effort dedicated to building and maintaining comprehensive, informative and balanced articles related to the geographic Palestine region, the Palestinian people and the State of Palestine on Wikipedia. Join us by visiting the project page, where you can add your name to the list of members where you can contribute to the discussions.PalestineWikipedia:WikiProject PalestineTemplate:WikiProject PalestinePalestine-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Brighton Mid‑importance

	East Sussex portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Brighton, an attempt at creating a standardized, informative, comprehensive and easy-to-use resource about Brighton and Hove. If you would like to participate, please visit the project pageBrightonWikipedia:WikiProject BrightonTemplate:WikiProject BrightonBrighton articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the importance scale.

Anti-war Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Anti-war, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the anti-war movement on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Anti-warWikipedia:WikiProject Anti-warTemplate:WikiProject Anti-warAnti-war articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Is it just me, or does anyone else think this article isn't entirely NPOV and leans towards the viewpoint of the protestors —Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.29.209.132 (talk • contribs) 12:31 25 May 2008 (UTC)

More than two years later, I agree with the IP above; this article seems to put forward the protesters' point of view. Speculative statements like 'If the trial had taken place the evidence of EDO's complicity in war crimes would have been brought to light' are not acceptable. I will try to clean up this article at some point in the future. Robofish (talk) 15:46, 12 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Well, I eventually got round to removing that statement. The article is slightly more neutral now. Robofish (talk) 15:33, 25 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on EDO MBM Technology Ltd v Campaign to Smash EDO. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://www.webcitation.org/692LyEIYq?url=http://www.ess.uwe.ac.uk/wcc/zyklonb.htm to http://www.ess.uwe.ac.uk/WCC/zyklonb.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:27, 15 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]