Talk:eCall

	European Union portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject European Union, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the European Union on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.European UnionWikipedia:WikiProject European UnionTemplate:WikiProject European UnionEuropean Union articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Telecommunications Low‑importance

	Telecommunication portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Telecommunications, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Telecommunications on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.TelecommunicationsWikipedia:WikiProject TelecommunicationsTemplate:WikiProject TelecommunicationsTelecommunications articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Transport Mid‑importance

	Transport portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Transport, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to Transport on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.TransportWikipedia:WikiProject TransportTemplate:WikiProject TransportTransport articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Automobiles Mid‑importance

	Cars portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Automobiles, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of automobiles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AutomobilesWikipedia:WikiProject AutomobilesTemplate:WikiProject AutomobilesAutomobile articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Disaster management Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Disaster management, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Disaster management on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Disaster managementWikipedia:WikiProject Disaster managementTemplate:WikiProject Disaster managementDisaster management articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Comments

The development of eCall is highly political with many industry players presenting skewed information to improve their position. Many aspects of eCall are not finalized. Much information is buried away in committees and working groups, and won't see the light of day until years from now. So many things that are true and relevant can't be posted to the article with a reference to back it up. Look out for propaganda in this article. —Preceding unsigned comment added by ErikH2000 (talk • contribs) 2007-07-14

Notability

This will be possibly the most important change to road safety regulations since airbags and ABS were made compulsory over a decade ago, and will affect and estimated 125 million European cars over the next decade, so the { { notability } } template was a bit preposterous in my opinion, and redundant with the 'improve' template. I have removed the former. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 88.15.8.141 (talk) 10:50, 5 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This is definitely notable as it is a gross invasion of privacy to make it compulsory, it is also another good reason for the UK to leave the EU which seems to be run by these absolute bastards. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.141.107.235 (talk) 23:41, 29 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

"Important" is not the same thing as "notable" and as the notability problem has not been addressed, I am restoring the tag. Please don't remove it until sources have been added to back up the claim for notability. --Guillaume2303 (talk) 15:08, 5 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

(same user as before) Nah, I couldn't care less about this article in particular or Wackypedia in general, I would have thought that the "notability" of this technology was rather self-evident but god knows what the definitions of "important" and "notable" are in the Wackyverse. Tell you what, how about trying to make yourself useful and doing a bit of Googling to see why this subject might (or possibly not) be "notable", or "important", or Wackyrelevant in some way. Bye. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 88.15.8.141 (talk) 22:53, 5 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on ECall. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20101106080439/http://www.esafetysupport.org/en/ecall_toolbox/index.html to http://www.esafetysupport.org/en/ecall_toolbox/index.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:15, 15 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Privacy

I think this is extremally importat topic. How does legislative and certification make sure the location data and telemetry are not accessible, when there is no emergency or explicit consent of the driver/owner? I guess, it could also be used to determine location of stolen car (i.e. if the keys were also stolen, or car was taken on truck, etc), but what procedures are available that only driver/owner can determine location, and not state or manufacturer or operator on a whim. 81.6.34.246 (talk) 18:07, 9 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]