Talk:ECW One Night Stand (2005)

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the ECW One Night Stand (2005) article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

ECW One Night Stand (2005) has been listed as one of the Sports and recreation good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
September 30, 2007	Peer review	Reviewed
November 10, 2007	Good article nominee	Listed

Current status: Good article

Professional wrestling Mid‑importance

	ECW One Night Stand (2005) is within the scope of WikiProject Professional wrestling, an attempt to improve and standardize articles related to professional wrestling. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, visit the project to-do page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and contribute to discussions.Professional wrestlingWikipedia:WikiProject Professional wrestlingTemplate:WikiProject Professional wrestlingProfessional wrestling articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

New York City Low‑importance

	New York City portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject New York City, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of New York City-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.New York CityWikipedia:WikiProject New York CityTemplate:WikiProject New York CityNew York City articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

GA Review

I am glad to report that this article nomination for good article status has been promoted. This is how the article, as of November 10, 2007, compares against the six good article criteria:

GA review (see here for criteria)

Is it reasonably well written?
A. Prose quality:

B. MoS compliance:
Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
A. References to sources:

B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:

C. No original research:
Is it broad in its coverage?
A. Major aspects:

B. Focused:
Is it neutral?
Fair representation without bias:
Is it stable?
No edit wars, etc:
Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:

B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
Overall:
Pass or Fail:

If you feel that this review is in error, feel free to take it to Good article reassessment. Thank you to all of the editors who worked hard to bring it to this status, and congratulations. -- LAX 00:11, 11 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Crowd Chants

How are they relevant to this article, especially the ones mentioned during the Benoit/Guerrero match that had nothing to do with the participants in the ring? Also, if it's OR to say they were about Lita, why is she linked when talking about them? It just seems to me that they are there so someone would have an excuse to write "fuck" a few times and they add nothing to the article.Wwehurricane1 (talk) 22:01, 22 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

They were part of the whole WWE vs. ECW angle that was a major storyline. When the audience chanted them doesn't matter. Where is Lita's name linked to in the chants other than the "Lita's got herpies" one? It wouldn't upset me to remove them (nor did I put them in the first place), but they have been in for quite some time and maybe should be discussed first. TJ Spyke 22:13, 22 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Fair enough. Wwehurricane1 (talk) 23:14, 22 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, and Lita is linked in this statement: "During this match, several anti-Lita chants could be heard, including "Lita's Got Herpes" and "I Fucked Lita".[22] " where it says "anti-Lita." Wwehurricane1 (talk) 23:15, 22 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The crowd was a big part of this event as far as atomoshpere etc went, of which the chants were an integral part. They are highly relevant and should stay. Tory88 (talk) 17:12, 18 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Maven

I'm pretty sure Maven was there as a part of the crusade. I'm not sure if he was not put in the description for a reason but if you individually listed everyone else I don't see why he shouldn't be listed with the RAW guys. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 63.27.77.26 (talk) 19:02, 13 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

It's not notable. Save Us.Y2J 15:41, August 16 2009 (UTC)

But you listed everyone else who was individually there it's not like La Resistance did anything that notable for the buildup yet you have no problem listing they were there? Just seems like lazy journalism to include everyone minus one person. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 63.27.79.239 (talk) 20:01, 9 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Do you have proof he was part of it? TJ Spyke 21:02, 9 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]