Talk:E. Jean Carroll v. Donald J. Trump

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the E. Jean Carroll v. Donald J. Trump article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Archives: 1: 30 days

The contentious topics procedure applies to this page. This page is related to post-1992 politics of the United States and closely related people, which has been designated as a contentious topic.

Editors who repeatedly or seriously fail to adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, any expected standards of behaviour, or any normal editorial process may be blocked or restricted by an administrator. Editors are advised to familiarise themselves with the contentious topics procedures before editing this page.

While the biographies of living persons policy does not apply directly to the subject of this article, it may contain material that relates to living persons, such as friends and family of persons no longer living, or living persons involved in the subject matter. Unsourced or poorly sourced contentious material about living persons must be removed immediately. If such material is re-inserted repeatedly, or if there are other concerns related to this policy, please see this noticeboard.

United States: Presidents Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject United States Presidents (assessed as Low-importance).

Law Low‑importance

	Law portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

New York (state) Low‑importance

	New York (state) portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject New York (state), a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of New York on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.New York (state)Wikipedia:WikiProject New York (state)Template:WikiProject New York (state)New York (state) articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Women's History Low‑importance

	History portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women's History, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Women's history and related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women's HistoryWikipedia:WikiProject Women's HistoryTemplate:WikiProject Women's HistoryWomen's History articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Status of counterclaim

It is hard to follow all the threads in this article. Trump filed a counterclaim on June 27, which was dismissed by Kaplan on August 7. Trump appealed this dismissal on August 10. On December 13, the Second Circuit ordered various things but did not explicitly mention this appeal; instead, the case was remanded to the district court for further proceedings. The article then states "On January 8, the 2nd Circuit declined to take up Trump's appeal again.[161]" However, the Forbes article [161] appears to be about a different topic, namely presidential immunity.

It is around here that the counterclaim disappears from the records. So I suppose it has been definitively dismissed, then? KarlFrei (talk) 09:09, 5 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Carroll I and Carroll II damages

The summary box at the top incorrectly reflects the damages awarded in each of the cases. It says $5 million was awarded in Carroll I and $83.3 million was awarded in Carroll II. This should be reversed. The text of the article correctly says that $5 million was awarded in Carroll II. I tried to fix this myself, but somebody reverted it, so whoever is babysitting this page can fix it. Moccus7 (talk) 23:53, 12 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry about that. I got confused. -- Valjean (talk) (PING me) 14:21, 13 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]