Jump to content

Talk:E. C. Row Expressway/GA1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA Review

[edit]
GA toolbox
Reviewing

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Dough4872 (talk · contribs) 02:19, 2 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

GA review (see here for criteria)

  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose): b (MoS):
    • In mentioning the place names for the termini in the infobox, you use West Windsor, Ontario and City of Windsor/Town of Tecumseh. Can this be reformatted to be consistent?
    • The mention of the eastern terminus in the infobox needs to be cleaned up. I would fix it to read "Banwell Road on border of City of Windsor/Town of Tecumseh", linking the latter town.
    • "the E. C. Row" sounds colloquial, should refer to it as the E. C. Row Expressway.
    • It is commonly referred to by this name by local news sources, so I assume it is a common local nickname, possibly even official in some way. - Floydian τ ¢
    • You use "sandwiched" a lot in the route description. Can some of these instances be replaced with different words?
    • Only twice actually haha... but I changed one instance regardless. - Floydian τ ¢
    • Delinked the second instance that does this. No article for him, but it is a worthy candidate for one in the future. - Floydian τ ¢
    • I noticed Highway 2 is unlinked in the Route description and the first instance in the History while linked in the second instance in the History. I would link the route at the first point it is mentioned in the prose.
    • Removed link from history section as it's already linked in the lede. - Floydian τ ¢
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
    • Can a source be added for the length in the infobox?
    • Citation needed for "The westernmost 3 kilometres (1.9 mi) of the expressway is undergoing reconstruction as part of the Herb Gray Parkway project, which will also result in construction of a new international crossing northwest of the intersection with Ojibway Parkway."
    • The sentence "No work has progressed on the extension since." needs a citation.
    • The entire future section is uncited; sources need to be added.
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects): b (focused):
    • Can some more historical information be added to the lead? Specifically when the expressway was built.
    • Do you have a kilometerpost for the Highway 401 junction?
    • Not that I can source at this time, though I know what it is. - Floydian τ ¢
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:
  6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
    A photo of the road would be nice, but not required.
    Hadn't checked for several years,
  7. Overall:
    Pass/Fail:

I will put the article on hold for fixes to be made. Dough4872 02:42, 2 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry for the delay, just got the notice of this about 2 or 3 days ago. All fixes made. - Floydian τ ¢ 01:15, 25 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
There is still one unsourced statement I pointed at above that needs to be addressed before I can pass this. Dough4872 01:42, 25 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Fixed. Thanks for the review :) - Floydian τ ¢ 03:15, 25 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
I will pass the article. Dough4872 03:18, 25 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]