Talk:E-mu Emulator X

This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Musical Instruments

	Music portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Musical Instruments, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of musical instruments on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Musical InstrumentsWikipedia:WikiProject Musical InstrumentsTemplate:WikiProject Musical Instrumentsmusical instruments articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
	This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool as Stub-class because it uses a stub template. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the `\|auto=` parameter.

I am removing the following from the article:

This softare is the top of E-MU range. There is a cut down version call Proteus X. This is basically the same as Emulator X minus fonction of creating sound from scratch. You will be then able to read he soundbank from E-MU, apply some changes on theses banks but if you need creating on your own, Emulator X is necessary.

A plug-in version f Proteus X is also available: proteus X LE. This will allows you to read your soundbank over a sampler software such as Cubase or Sonar to name only 2 of them.

It is included here if someone would like to attempt to reincorporate it into this or another article, but being that it mostly concerns the E-mu Proteus X, I don't think that it should be reincorporated. - Two Halves

"It is the last software sampler produced that retains the ability to directly sample other sources, in contrast to current software samplers, which require existing samples and are therefore more akin to traditional ROMplers. Among the more noteworthy sampling features added in Emulator X2 is SynthSwipe, a tool which gives Emulator X the ability to sample from connected MIDI devices such as hardware synthesizers by sending a series of notes at differing velocities via MIDI and automatically recording the device's output to create a new fully mapped sample bank."

This whole section is uncited and contains a few statements that are pretty much opinion - I'd suggest losing it? Risc Terilia (talk) 09:33, 6 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I was going to take it out as well. The line about directly sampling other sources sounds ridiculous - at first. But on the other hand I can't think of many other VST samplers that actually record, instead of just loading samples or using the host DAW to record audio. -Ashley Pomeroy (talk) 13:03, 31 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]