Talk:E-Types
Appearance
This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Requested move
[edit]- The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the move request was: moot, since the article is already in mainspace. Kotniski (talk) 17:07, 5 October 2010 (UTC)
User:Misspolsci/e-types → e-Types — I believe this article is ready for wikispace. Misspolsci (talk) 11:28, 27 September 2010 (UTC)
- Neutral Does not seem blatantly promotional.
Oppose--Cybercobra (talk) 16:23, 1 October 2010 (UTC)Has no lead section; doesn't even explicitly say what sort of company e-Types is;notability not sufficiently demonstrated.
User:Misspolsci/e-types → e-Types — As a student of creative design businesses i see the academic focus on this consultancy as very important contributions and it has been very helpful during my process of writing a thesis, therefore I would want to make the literature more accessible through wikipedia Misspolsci (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 08:44, 1 October 2010 (UTC).
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.
Categories:
- Stub-Class Denmark articles
- Low-importance Denmark articles
- All WikiProject Denmark pages
- Stub-Class company articles
- Low-importance company articles
- WikiProject Companies articles
- Stub-Class Graphic design articles
- Low-importance Graphic design articles
- Stub-Class Marketing & Advertising articles
- Low-importance Marketing & Advertising articles
- WikiProject Marketing & Advertising articles