Talk:Dyson's transform
Appearance
This page was proposed for deletion by Arthur Rubin (talk · contribs) on 13 March 2009 with the comment: Accurate, but gives neither a real source, nor evidence of notability. It was contested by Uncia (talk · contribs) on 2009-03-13 with the comment: article improved to address nominator's concerns |
This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||
|
Please write understandable
[edit]The modern life give us very little possibilities to use precious time to interpret. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2001:4643:E6E3:0:B99A:4E6A:45C0:A343 (talk) 22:10, 7 January 2019 (UTC)
Dyson's transform
[edit]This article never gets around to saying what "Dyson's transform" is. It's also badly written in several other respects:
- It may be confusing the singleton of a set with the set itself;
- It has no proper initial context-setting;
- Some notation style issues.