Jump to content

Talk:Dyesebel

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Did You Know
A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on August 13, 2007.
The text of the entry was: Did you know ...that Dyesebel (pictured), a popular mermaid character in Filipino comic books, cinema and television, was based on Philippine folklore?

Andersen inspired?

[edit]

How old is this folk tale? It mirrors Hans Christian Andersen's story, The Little Mermaid. That's pre-1875.Julia Rossi 08:06, 13 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The references in this article don't date Dyesebel any earlier than 1953. According to the Darna article, Dyesebel was created by Mars_Ravelo (1916 - 1988), a Phillipine graphic novelist. So it seems much more likely that Dyesebel is based on The Little Mermaid than the other way around. I think there is something misleading in the main-page blurb. Mermaids do figure in Phillipine folklore. But Dyesebel seems to be a recent creation, still under copyright, not folkore or folk tale. How long does a story have to be around before it can become a folk tale? What is the difference between folklore and popular culture? --SV Resolution(Talk) 13:04, 13 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
At the moment "folklore" has been removed from the text, but not from the image caption or from the category. Art LaPella 13:47, 13 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
... So I updated the caption. But, as Dyesebel is a mermaid, or sirena, I have left the folklore category in. --72.94.164.124 18:32, 13 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
I've removed the Philippine Mythology box as the article no longer contains the Philippine mythology category. And, despite featuring an individual mythical creature, this is still a work of pop culture, not of folklore. The Little Mermaid (especially the Disney film) doesn't link to the European folklore category, so why should this article be any different? 67.167.29.149 (talk) 04:34, 1 January 2009 (UTC) Chris G.[reply]

Date of first movie

[edit]

According to imdb (http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0488390/) The first Dysebel movie came out in 1950. --SV Resolution(Talk) 10:59, 13 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

According to the Ravelo official website, first film was in 1953 (http://marsravelodarna.tripod.com/id35.html); latest was 1997. Made correction about the latter ("1997" instead of IMDb's "1990"). - Dragonbite 14:03, 13 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

derivative

[edit]

This "folklore" (which usually implies some older history) is clearly taken not only from the pre-existing and well-known Little Mermaid tale (as noted above), but also seems to borrow somewhat from Pinnochio. That being said, there are no new stories, only different ways of telling them. The story of the quest for humanity is as old as it is timeless... from Pygmalion to Data on Star Trek. Is it possible that the origins of this story have deeper roots in some kind of Phillipine mythology and the development is parallel to European tales and not simply borrowed? 70.71.10.57 12:52, 13 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Same name as biblical character?

[edit]

I guess this is the same name as Jezebel (Bible)

Is this worth mentioning? 213.202.153.8 15:15, 13 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

If Dyesebel actually is "Jezebel" in Tagalog, that's pretty interesting. Mars Ravelo may have taken inspiration from a variety of sources. --SV Resolution(Talk) 16:59, 13 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Even if it's not the biblical character, it at least seems like a carabao english or barok pronouncion/spelling of Jezebel/Jesibel, a common practice in the Filipino literature for one reason or another (humor/satire, appeal of the exotic through localization).
It would be worth mentioning if it were actually literarilly significant to the subject- drawing parallels in character perhaps? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.153.29.23 (talk) 08:26, 24 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
I went and added a link to the Jezebel disambiguation page. If nothing else, it would be due to pronunciation issues. --Geopgeop (talk) 02:08, 24 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File:Dyesebel comic cover CHECK.jpg Nominated for speedy Deletion

[edit]
An image used in this article, File:Dyesebel comic cover CHECK.jpg, has been nominated for speedy deletion at Wikimedia Commons for the following reason: Copyright violations
What should I do?
Speedy deletions at commons tend to take longer than they do on Wikipedia, so there is no rush to respond. If you feel the deletion can be contested then please do so (commons:COM:SPEEDY has further information). Otherwise consider finding a replacement image before deletion occurs.

This notification is provided by a Bot --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 06:23, 8 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Dyesebel. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 10:00, 21 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Dyesebel. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:43, 15 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Filipino

[edit]

Bakit ito naging pelikula? 112.209.155.96 (talk) 02:43, 20 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Dyesebel&oldid=1207071238"