Talk:Dyadic transformation

Notation

Hi, what means : $\mathbb {R} ^{\infty },$ -- (talk) 18:14, 2 September 2009 (UTC)

Merge bit shift map into this article

Okay, I'll merge the bit shift map article into the dyadic transformation article. Duoduoduo (talk) 19:05, 27 May 2010 (UTC)

Done. Duoduoduo (talk) 17:21, 28 May 2010 (UTC)

Please can you clarify (within the article) your sentence "Equivalently, if we are able to view each iterate of as it actually occurs (as opposed to our simulated values), then we obtain an information flow of one bit per iteration, compared to what we would have known from our simulation." at the end of the section Rate of information loss and sensitive dependence on initial conditions. It is not clear what "as it actually occurs" means, and where the "information flow" is flowing from and to. Gandalf61 (talk) 10:30, 29 May 2010 (UTC)

Correspondence to logistic map

Not sure what the comment below means, but there is certainly an error in the section about r=4 case of logistic map being bit-shift under sine square change of variables. The r=4 case of the logistic map then looks like the tent map, not the bit-shift map. It is just as chaotic, but the manners in which these two transformations map (0.5,1) to (0,1) are reversed. I don't think these are topologically conjugate. (Disclaimer: I am actually a topologist, but not a dynamicist). -- Denis 192.16.204.74 (talk) 17:15, 2 June 2017 (UTC)

Bit-shift: 0.75->0.5 r=4: 0.75->0.75 -32ieww 10:04PM 11/19/2015 NY time 32ieww (talk) 03:04, 20 November 2015 (UTC)

Image color map

What does the colormap in the first image encode? Does the brightness correspond to the number of appearances or the darkness? Is it even accumulative? The caption should be improved. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Roxanabujack (talk • contribs) 00:04, 30 November 2017 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Dyadic transformation. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130212163126/http://www.maths.bristol.ac.uk/~maxcu/Doubling.pdf to http://www.maths.bristol.ac.uk/~maxcu/Doubling.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:20, 27 December 2017 (UTC)

Periodicity via bit shifts rationality of periodic orbits

In the derivation to prove that periodic and preperiodic orbits are orbits of rational numbers, the derivation should read

$y\sum _{j=0}^{\infty }2^{-jm}={\frac {y}{1-2^{-m}}}$

instead of

$y\sum _{j=0}^{\infty }2^{-jm}={\frac {y}{1-2^{m}}}$

as it is now. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 54.37.18.136 (talk) 16:40, 5 May 2021 (UTC)