Talk:Dwyka
Appearance
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Dwyka page. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This disambiguation page does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Not even a village
[edit]I don't think Dwyka is really big enough to be considered a village or even a hamlet. There is literally nothing there but the railway halt - satellite images show only a single building. The Trig Survey map and the SA Geo Names System regard it as merely a railway station and not a settlement. - htonl (talk) 09:01, 18 December 2013 (UTC)
- The German wiki article says it has a population of 100, but I don't know where they got that figure, and after checking the satellite maps I tend to agree with you. If it's only a railway halt, shouldn't we delete this article as non-notable?--eh bien mon prince (talk) 07:24, 26 December 2013 (UTC)
- The German article seems to be unsourced, and indeed I can't see where 100 people could be living anywhere in the vicinity.
I will WP:PROD the article.- htonl (talk) 07:47, 26 December 2013 (UTC) - Actually, I've made it a disambig between Dwyka River and Dwyka Group. - htonl (talk) 07:51, 26 December 2013 (UTC)
- The German article seems to be unsourced, and indeed I can't see where 100 people could be living anywhere in the vicinity.