Talk:Dwight D. Eisenhower Memorial

This article is written in American English, which has its own spelling conventions (color, defense, traveled) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus.

United States: District of Columbia Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Washington, D.C. portal This article is supported by WikiProject District of Columbia (assessed as Low-importance).

National Register of Historic Places High‑importance

	National Register of Historic Places portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject National Register of Historic Places, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of U.S. historic sites listed on the National Register of Historic Places on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.National Register of Historic PlacesWikipedia:WikiProject National Register of Historic PlacesTemplate:WikiProject National Register of Historic PlacesNational Register of Historic Places articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Visual arts: Public art

	Visual arts portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Visual arts, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of visual arts on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Visual artsWikipedia:WikiProject Visual artsTemplate:WikiProject Visual artsvisual arts articles
	This article is supported by the public art task force.

Military history: Memorials

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion not met Structure: criterion not met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	Military memorials and cemeteries task force

Infobox info

As a proposed memorial, much of the infobox is blank. The lat/long is based on a "best guess" given the recommended location. — Eoghanacht ^talk 14:45, 9 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject class rating

This article was automatically assessed because at least one WikiProject had rated the article as stub, and the rating on other projects was brought up to Stub class. BetacommandBot 15:26, 9 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Reads like an Advert

My goodness this article is full of POV to the point that it reads like an advocacy piece for the memorial. This needs a lot more fixing than I, at this time, can provide. Paul, in Saudi (talk) 10:52, 7 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I agree. You should have seen it before; I tried to add more background and factual stuff, but didn't really want to engage in an edit war with anyone else over removing the POV stuff. Frankly, it seems as if one or more previous contributors decided to throw in every positive comment they could find. - Tim1965 (talk) 16:37, 28 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Design approval

The National Capital Planning Commission (NCPC) approved revised preliminary and final site and building plans for the Memorial on October 5, 2017.^[1] --PhotographerTom (talk) 14:09, 20 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

References

^ "Media Release: NCPC Approves Eisenhower Memorial". www.ncpc.gov.

The website history timeline forgets all about executive order 10450

Folks:

I notice that the timeline interactive exhibit on the website for the memorial completely omitted mention of Eisenhower's issue of Executive Order 10450, which ruined the lives of many of my LGBTQ brothers and sisters.

Is this something that I can go ahead and put into the article?Allyn (talk) 06:36, 16 September 2020 (UTC) Mark Allyn, Bellingham, Washington[reply]

Allyn, You will have to find sources that connect the memorial specifically with that EO but you might want to make go instead to coverage (or more coverage) in the bio or presidency articles -- this article does not actually discuss much, if any, of the details of his presidency, nor his army life, nor his biography. Alanscottwalker (talk) 21:32, 18 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, you are correct. The executive order is mentioned in the main article on Ike. What I wanted to try to point out (and please pardon me if it is inappropriate) that the memorial and it's website are incomplete because they do not mention this executive order that has severely and negatively impacted our LGBTQ community.Allyn (talk) 01:30, 26 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

[1] "Media Release: NCPC Approves Eisenhower Memorial". www.ncpc.gov.

[1]