Talk:Dutch Masters (cigar)

Business Low‑importance

	Business portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Business, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of business articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BusinessWikipedia:WikiProject BusinessTemplate:WikiProject BusinessWikiProject Business articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Florida Low‑importance

	Florida portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Florida. If you would like to join us, please visit the project page; if you have any questions, please consult the FAQ.FloridaWikipedia:WikiProject FloridaTemplate:WikiProject FloridaFlorida articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Brands

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Brands, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of brands on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BrandsWikipedia:WikiProject BrandsTemplate:WikiProject BrandsBrands articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

The marijuana connection

This article cites the manufacturer's web site for its claim that the cigars "are mainly used to rolling and smoking marijuana." Of course, the web site cited says no such thing. - Lunasspecto (talk) 15:17, 14 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You're right that the citation isn't correct, but everyone knows that Dutch Masters roll a fine blunt. You should try it sometime. 67.165.86.89 (talk) 02:05, 16 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

serious disambiguation needed

I came here looking for a list of the names of the guys in the famous picture and found a weird pothead ramble. Fort Knox, currency backed with Cigars? Washington Whirlwind? Author doesn't even mention how to roll a honey dutch. 173.19.25.224 (talk) 16:31, 26 October 2008 (UTC)User:Timbabwe[reply]

this is the most blatant case i have seen of having a commercial type article take over a space that should relate to art history, at a minimum the art article needs to be written and disambiguation occurAnlace 20:11, 21 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I will move it in a second - you'll have to write about Rembrandt etc. in this namespace though, b/c I'm not qualified. --Joe 23:50, 4 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I seriously agree with you Anlace. If I get a chance I will try and do itTake a Walk on the Wild Side but I'm not entirely sure how to go about it. Would you say that there should be a disambig page at Dutch Masters or should there be the page for the painters with a template at the top directing people to the cigar page if that is what they meant? I would suggest the second option given that that is what I assume people would generally think about in reference to "Dutch Masters" - Painting not Cigars. Witty lama 04:35, 20 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Name should be "Dutch Masters (cigar brand)." Not just "(cigar)". Chenzo23 05:21, 4 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

There has to be a better way to say "weed smokers" —Preceding unsigned comment added by 199.212.11.10 (talk) 22:16, 13 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Should this statement be here: 'Said "blunts" are known to get one high off ones ass.'? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.2.139.26 (talk) 16:13, 29 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Dutch Masters (cigar). Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/20060410172757/http://www.cigaraficionado.com:80/Cigar/CA_Daily/CA_Daily_News/0,2342,885,00.html to http://www.cigaraficionado.com/Cigar/CA_Daily/CA_Daily_News/0,2342,885,00.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 14:04, 9 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]