Talk:Dust reduction system

Should we mention Sigma's sealed DSLRs? It might not be a high-tech dust reduction system, but sealing the mirror box does work quite well in practice. Being the owner of an SD14 and a D80 I can tell you the D80 needs a lot of cleaning, and the SD14 barely so. Rnbc (talk) 14:39, 11 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

OK by me. It has been mentioned here: Digital_single-lens_reflex_camera#Dust_reduction_systems --RenniePet (talk) 16:45, 11 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Article copied from elsewhere?

It appears that the article, or sections of it at least, has been copied verbatim from Olympus' description of their dust removal system. Perhaps it is the other way around, but I am inclined to think the former. See http://www.olympus.co.uk/consumer/dslr_7051.htm. Should this be cited in the references? Intercrew 2k (talk) 23:56, 17 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Additional topic request

Does it make sense to also include dust reduction system powered tools or is there a better spot to add or link additional information? Off topic from digital cameras, a dust reduction system is a technology that utilizes the application of water or local exhaust ventilation to reduce airborne dust generated by powered tools or equipment. When power tools are used to cut, grind, drill or core concrete masonry products, those tools must be equipped with a dust reduction system that prevents the generation of respirable dust. Gram99 (talk) 16:41, 20 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Dust Reduction Systems are used to reduce dust.... HOW?

There is no real mention of how dust is removed. To just say Dust Reduction Systems are a technology for removing dust is not sufficient. Anyone could say that. The article talks about dust, but not about how it's removed. I put some tags on the page but didn't see one for article doesn't cover topic. Article doesn't cover topic but skirts around it. Avé 10:20, 28 January 2011 (UTC) Kind of fixed the problem....Avé 02:29, 29 January 2011 (UTC)

Merger proposal

I propose that Supersonic Wave Filter be merged into Dust_reduction_system#Piezo_Crystal_Ultrasonic_Vibration_of_Filter. I think that the content in the SsWF article can easily be explained in the context of this section, and the this article is of a reasonable size in which the merging of SsWF will not cause any problems as far as article size or undue weight is concerned. Also SsWF has been tagged as an ad, and it does seem to be a bit promotional. Putting it here would help this article and also seems more appropriate for Wikipedia. Avé 01:40, 29 January 2011 (UTC)

Non-redundant text from Supersonic Wave Filter was merged here. --Wtshymanski (talk) 00:27, 31 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Dust reduction system. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:16, 15 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]